Friday, April 28, 2017

Leftists Can't Think

The Left believes that evolution is an indisputable fact.

The Left believes that homosexuality being a genetic trait is an indisputable fact.

So, if homosexuals can't pass down their best genetic traits to their offspring - because they have very, very few of them - why hasn't homosexuality disappeared due to "natural selection"?

Only insane people can hold two polar-opposite beliefs like that in their minds at once.

Sunday, April 09, 2017

Trump Supporters: Puddles

So President Trump launches some missiles at Syria in retaliation for a chemical attack on civilians, and his supporters light their hair on fire, shrieking, "We elected him because he promised not to get involved in other countries' wars!".

Where to start.

First of all, I run hot and cold on Trump. He has done some great things already in the few months that he's been in office. Appointing Neil Gorsuch to the SCOTUS being the best example. However, he does seem to be swayed by the Leftists in his midst, his son-in-law in particular. Truthfully, I still don't trust the guy to be the Conservative that he ran as during the campaign. I voted for him, but it was reluctantly.

What amuses me about these missile strikes on Syria, is how quickly his supporters turned on him. Their "support" is a mile wide and an inch deep. Shallow. And, unfortunately, it kind of confirms what the MSM has been saying about them: they really ain't all that bright. If they could think about the situation for a second, they'd calm the fuck down. They reacted just like the outrage-mobs of the Left: no thought given, just instant outrage because he did something that they didn't like. And, of course, the conspiracy theories came out immediately - again, just like Leftist snowflakes.

If his "supporters" were capable of any strategic thinking at all, they would understand that the missile strikes served a few purposes.

1) Putting the world on notice that chemical weapons are not to be used.

2) Putting the world on notice that any action that threatens America - directly or indirectly - will be met with swift action. Trump hit Syria within 72 hours of the chemical weapons attack. That is extremely fast in the political world.

3) But, most importantly, it puts the world on notice that the policies of the pussy Obama administration are null and void. There's a new sherrif in town, to use a cliche, and we won't be dithering about and hemming and hawing and wringing our hands for months before we issue empty threats about "red lines" and then never actually do anything.

The New York Times asks, "After the Airstrikes on Syria, Now What?". To which my reply would be, "How about - nothing?". Of course, the article is the usual NYT's Leftist, anti-Trump drivel, but it is the important question. The problem is, Trump's supporters, Like the NYT, seems to think that the missile strikes may be the first step towards a full-scale invasion of Syria and/or Iran. For both the Leftists and many of Trump's supporters, they just couldn't wait to set their hair on fire and leap into the pool of sweet, sweet outrage. It's very sad that the same people who brought some hope, however small, to this country by electing Trump now can't wait to burn it all down over what is, in reality, a very trivial matter that won't be remembered in a month or two.

Trump didn't promise to never use military force, but his followers seem to think that is what he campaigned on. He promised that he wouldn't be indulging in nation building and going to war over things that weren't in our nation's interest. I don't see how launching some missiles to send a message invalidates that position. But, then, I tend to think before I react.

UPDATE: The administration seems to be validating the fact that this was a one-time thing and that their policy in Syria hasn't changed at all.

Also, this explains the points that I made above: To Kill a Chicken to Scare Monkeys.


Saturday, April 08, 2017

You Can Take the Somali Out Of The 3rd World Shithole...

But you can't take the third world shithole out of the Somalis.

Democratic caucus melt down in bloody chaos


Although, now that I think about it, I work in Minneapolis and it is quickly becoming a third world shithole.

Wednesday, March 08, 2017

Questions for you Climatologists (rhymes with Scientologists):

What is the temperature of the earth supposed to be? Why? How do you know that?
Has the climate changed before? Will it change again? Did animals and humans survive (and thrive) during previous changes to the climate?
How many of these scientists rely on government and NGO grants from people who will profit from "climate change" for their paychecks? Is that not a huge potential conflict of interest? Would you believe a scientist who was paid by Exxon?
Why does every "solution" to "climate change" always - ALWAYS - involve turning over more of our money and power to those who crave money and power like a heroin addict craves a fix?
Why did the phrase "global warming" suddenly need to be changed to "climate change" once it was shown that the earth had stopped warming in 1996 and, indeed, still has continued to not warm?
Why do "environmentalists" defend their catechism with a zeal and fanaticism that even hardcore religious fundamentalists find creepy?
Whatever happened to "acid rain" and the hole in the ozone layer that was supposed to have killed us all by now?
How much of Mother Earth are we supposed to despoil with windmills and solar panels. How many dead birds are an acceptable sacrifice to your Gods? Why are strip mines ugly, but miles and miles of windmills and solar panels aren't?
Your cult has been predicting doom for 30 years or more. Why should we believe you when NOT ONE of your predictions have come true? None. Zero. Nada. Nichts. People laugh at doomsday preachers. We laugh at you.
Why do your High Priests (AlGore, Leonardo DiCaprio, Michael Moore, etc.) all have "carbon footprints" the size of a good-sized town? It takes an amazing amount of faith for you to believe these people are sincere.
Why does your mascot-of-doom, the polar bear, seem to be thriving?

What percentage of "climate change" is "man-made"? If the "science is settled", you should have a number, right?
When will we know that our efforts to stop "climate change" have been successful? Or, like every other Leftist program, will it be a never-ending source of power and money for those who profit from it?
Oh Ye of the Church of the Everlasting Global warming, please answer these questions. If you can do so convincingly, perhaps I'll take you seriously. I won't be holding my breath.

Thursday, March 02, 2017

Remember: You Asked for This

If the Left succeeds in bringing down Attorney General Jeff Sessions, Trump's response should be simple: appoint Ted Cruz or Trey Gowdy.

If they take out Betsy DeVos as Education Secretary, appoint Ann Coulter!

In other words, anyone whom the Left does manage to take down should be replaced by someone even farther to the Right.

I'm betting the Democrats' fervor for taking Cabinet members out would cool down very, very quickly.

Democrats Never Change

Just add some matching hoods, and they'll look just like their old friends in the KKK.


A Question

The Left believes that there is no such thing as objective reality. That people make their own reality.

So ask yourself this: Why would Leftists make up a reality filled with misogyny, homophobia, Islamophobia, racism and everything else that they hate?

Interesting question, that.

Thursday, January 12, 2017

Logic: Not Their Strong Point

I once worked at a small company that made scrapers, putty knives and various painting equipment. Our customers consisted of Home Depot and many smaller accounts. Home Depot was about 80% of our business.

The Sales Manager - whose job seemed to be cutting out various articles and giving them to the owner of the company, in addition to flying around the country to conventions/shopping sprees - had, as far as I could tell, not brought a single new customer onboard in the 2-1/2 years that I worked there. All of our clients were holdovers from the previous owners of the company.

One day this woman came up with this brilliant idea: We'll concentrate on the smaller, mom-and-pop hardware stores and phase out Home Depot. The owner, who I'm sure either was sleeping with, or wanted to sleep with, this fool, jumped in with both feet and, soon, we started losing Home Depot's business

Needless to say, the business crashed and burned within a year. Luckily, I had moved on by then.

That whole farce came back to me not long after the last election. The Democrats, in their wisdom, decided to try to cobble together a base of small, not very powerful "customers" (e.g. pick your Democrat freakshow group) while ignoring the big powerhouse that is the vast majority of this country: normal, middle-class Americans.

And the results were the same. And, like the company that I worked for, they just couldn't figure out what went wrong. And these were supposedly the "smart" people.

 *******************************************************************************

Completely off topic, but here are some anecdotes from this company that are too funny not to share.

The owner walked up to my boss (who became a good friend of mine) and made this amazing statement: "You know, I just realized that, for every putty knife that we put together, we have to have a steel blank and a handle coming in the back door". Think about that.

And this was after the guy had owned the company for five years, and worked there for five years before he had bought the place (he was a rich, urban, Jewish guy born with your proverbial silver spoon in his mouth, so he was obviously a Lefty).

Another time he walked outside while my boss and I were on break, pointed to the busy highway in front of the place and asked, "What are those big, black birds that I always see on the side of the road?".

To which my boss said, "You mean...crows?".

The owner said, "Oh, is that what they are?", and turned and went inside.

The owner loved him some German engineering. All of our machines were from Germany. He also drove nothing but BMW's.

One day I asked him why he liked BMW's so much and, of course, he went on about the wonders of German engineering. I nodded knowingly (although German engineers are as logically clueless as any others) and slipped into the conversation how BMW stood for Bremen Motor Works, which the Nazis staffed with slave labor during WWII. He looked at me like he knew that I was making a point, but he just couldn't figure out what it might be. Remember: this guy was Jewish.

On another occasion, my boss was in a meeting and our HR Manager, a complete Leftist (ain't they all?), suggested that, because our employees were almost all Mexican, we should learn to speak Spanish instead of them learning English.

My boss, being the great Conservative that he is, absolutely let her have it. The meeting adjourned very shortly thereafter with lots of startled faces.

It was an interesting place to work. Stupidity can be very entertaining.








Wednesday, January 11, 2017

Never Thought I'd See This

I wasn't a huge supporter of Donald Trump. I still don't know that I trust him to do what he said he was going to do on the campaign trail. However, I am coming around. His cabinet picks are great, for starters.

However, the absolute best thing about him is watching the media flailing around, caught absolutely flatfooted, shrieking like long-spoiled children who have suddenly, repeatedly been told, "No!".

"This is not how the game goes!", they scream."You're supposed to play by our rules!", they whine.

After decades of watching Republican politicians get the "deer in the headlights" look any time that a reporter would accuse them of any of the Left's "isms" or "phobias", it does my heart good to see someone finally look the Fakestream Media in the eye and say, "Fuck you! War!" (No wonder Breitbart.com supported Trump so rabidly). Not even Reagan went this far in chastising the media.

The media have had their way for so long, that they have absolutely no idea how to react to Trump. It never occurred to them that the rules could be changed, because the rules hadn't been changed for almost 100 years! At least since the time of FDR, and probably even before that.

The media throws "racism" at him, and Trump looks at them like the pieces of shit that they are and says, "Fuck you". Now they are the ones with the "deer in the headlights" look.

It is a breathtaking sight to behold. Even if he doesn't do half of what he says that he'll do, if he keeps on shredding these credentialed idiots in the press, I'll support him 110%.

Friday, December 30, 2016

Why Not The First?

The Rights in The Bill of Rights of The Constitution of the United States were supposed to be absolute. That's why there's language in it such as "shall not be infringed" and "shall make no law".

And, yet, the Left has been infringing upon the 2nd Amendment (among others) for years and they never stop trying to infringe upon that right even more. So why can't the 1st Amendment be infringed upon, too?

When the Constitution was written, a free press was envisioned as one of the checks to government. The press was supposed to be a watchdog, keeping the government as honest as possible. I wonder if the Founders ever imagined that the press would eventually have a huge hand in enabling an ever-bigger government, the vast majority of whose acts are unconstitutional.

If the Left infringes upon our 2nd amendment rights, I say it's about time that we infringe upon the press' 1st amendment rights. After all, they're taking rights away from us, even though we've done nothing wrong. When you consider the damage that has been done by the traitorous scum in the "mainstream media", this would be the very least we could do to them. Hanging from light poles would be more fitting for a lot of them.

So my proposal is simple: If you're an organization that disseminates news, and you want to insist that you're unbiased, then you cheer for/attack both sides, Left and Right in approximate equal measure. You also hire an approximate number of "journalists" from both sides (since there really are no "moderates" in the game anymore, we can skip that part).

The alternative is to state your bias upfront or be shut down.

To those of us on the Right, it really wouldn't matter. Our news sources proudly state their bias. The only one who doesn't is Fox, but I doubt that they'd have a problem declaring themselves as being to the right.

But the Leftist press organizations always insist that they're not biased, no matter how obviously far left they are. They have to. If they were to come out and tell the people that they sought the destruction of this country, they'd be hung from the aforementioned light poles.

Yes, it sounds a lot like the "Fairness Doctrine", The difference is that, under the "Fairness Doctrine", left-wing news outlets were never penalized, no matter how much they rooted for the Communists of the world, while the few right-wing news outlets were scrutinized with a microscope. This would hold the Left to account as well.

Is it censorship? Yep. But if they can keep me from my basic, fundamental right of defending my life and my family's life, I don't see a problem in forcing them to actually just tell the truth about who they are. That would be pretty insignificant by comparison.

If "shall not be infringed" doesn't mean what it says, why should "shall make no law" mean what it says?





Saturday, December 10, 2016

Democrats Explained

Coincidence that "about half" of voters vote Democrat? I think not.

"The study demonstrated that about half of individuals will come to believe a fictional event occurred if they are told about that event and then repeatedly imagine it happening. "

Read it. It really explains a lot about how Democrats can believe things that are, obviously, not true.

Monday, December 05, 2016

Dear Allstate

Sent today:

After being a customer for the past 15 years, I now see that my values don't align with yours. I would hate to impinge upon your integrity, so I will be getting quotes from other insurers who are smart enough not to stick their noses into politics.

You insure my house, my motorcycle and two vehicles. While it may not be a significant amount to you, I find it odd that you don't want to align yourself with people like me who actually give you money. Therefore, I won't force you to align yourself with me by taking my money. I may not have any business training, but it seems incredibly stupid to insult your customers.

I will be cancelling my accounts (91197xxxx, 90236xxxx, 90236xxxx) as soon as I get a decent quote. I will even gladly pay a bit more so as not to align myself with such a bigoted company.

Kellogg's and Allstate

100% of your daily allowance of bigotry. And, you're in bigoted hands with Allstate.

Just got back from the grocery store. Checked everything that I bought to make sure that it wasn't made by Kellog's. I'd miss the occasional Pop-tart, but the generic ones are just as good.

Go sign the petition to #Dumpkellogs.


I've been a customer of Allstate Insurance for 15 years. I never realized that they were stupid enough to hug the Leftist bullies.

Today, I sent them an e-mail telling them that I would be getting quotes from other insurance companies and would soon be dumping them. They insure my house, my motorcycle, my truck and my daughter's car. So, while losing my business may not be a big deal for them, it is a good chunk of money every month that some other company that is smart enough to ignore the Leftist bullies will now be getting. #DumpAllstate

I haven't shopped at Target since their idiotic policy of letting men into the same rest room that my daughter uses. Not a nickel to them. #DumpTarget

Who are these "businessmen" who think that they can somehow increase their bottom line by insulting a huge part of their customer base?