Exile from Hillary's Village

Pathetically Hilarious

2010-12-07T19:58:00.000-08:00

Obama is so screwed.

If he doesn't please the 10% of Marxist fanatic voters who got him elected he's screwed.

If he goes against the 90% of the real American population that disagrees with those Marxists, he's screwed.

He relied upon a group of complete, left-wing fanatics to get himself elected. They don't have the mental acuity to realize that, sometimes, compromise is necessary. Especially when your party has just been devastated in an off-year election. Like the six-year-olds that they are, they want what they want. Thinking ahead is far too adult for their tiny little minds.

I don't know which I'm enjoying more: these Lefty children throwing a tantrum because their unrealistic expectations aren't being met, or Obama's deer-in-the-headlights cluelessness now that he has lost most of his power.

And the new "Tea Party" Congress isn't even here yet.

No More, No More

2010-11-04T17:12:00.000-07:00

Baby I'm a dreamer
Found my horse and carriage
- Aerosmith

Pass bills, let Obama veto them, repeat until 2012.

Gotta Break a Few Eggs to Make an Omelette

2010-11-03T20:26:00.000-07:00

Correct me if I'm wrong, but I seem to remember back in 2007 many Republicans & Conservatives saying that, maybe, we should just stay home, let Obama win, show the country what a disaster electing a Socialist would be, and letting the country come back to us in 2010.

And I also seem to remember some of the "greatest" minds of the right-wing political world telling us that it would be a really bad thing to do. That it wouldn't work. That we couldn't risk it. That the American people would just drift farther to the left once they got a taste of Big Nannyism. That we should just vote for the RINO because the slow train to Socialism is better than the fast train.

And now here we are: Obama won, the Democrat Party is, mostly, despised and discredited. Their left-wing agenda and totalitarian tactics have been rejected by a very large majority of the American people. The corruption of their people and their processes has been exposed like a bug under a rock and they're scurrying away from the sunlight as fast as they can.

Conservatism has shot up like a rocket, people are demanding that the Constitution be adhered to, big-government is seen as the problem and not the solution and the Tea Party Movement has brought millions of previously uninvolved people to the side of sanity.

All because nobody could get really excited about voting for RINO John McCain and, therefore, guaranteed a win by Socialist Barack Obama.

And what I find really amazing is that I seem to be the only person who remembers this. I haven't heard a peep about it anywhere. I don't mean this in any self-aggrandizing way. I really am just amazed that nobody else seems to have brought this up.

It just goes to show - once again - that you should never rely on the opinion of an "expert".

Insanity Is...

2010-09-25T15:52:00.000-07:00

The popular definition of insanity is, "doing the same thing over and over, and expecting a different result."

Well, for the past 50 years we've been following the "Buckley Rule" which states that you're supposed to support the most Conservative candidate who can win. And, for the past 50 years, this country has been sliding ever closer to outright Communism.

I have no doubt that Bill Buckley was a genius but, apparently, not even he could see where that philosophy would lead us.

The flaw in the theory is that you never really know who can win. Could Mike Castle win in Delaware? Probably. But...could Christine O'Donnell win? Quite possibly. Especially if Chris Coonz's "bearded Marxist" comments get out into the general public. The country, including Delaware, has seen Marxism in action for the past 2 years and it scares the Hell out of them.

What the "Buckley Rule" has gotten us is a bunch of Democrats with an "R" next to their name. And, the farther Left that the Democrat Party slides, the farther left that the Republican Party slides. So what in the Hell is the sense in continuing that?

From now on, we need "The Exile Rule": vote for the most Conservative person in the race. Period. Polls have shown forever that this country is majority Conservative.

Why can't the likes of "political genius" Karl Rove make that simple connection?

Careful What You Wish For, Lefty

2010-09-17T20:07:00.000-07:00

The Left spent eight years screeching about "neo-cons" and attempting to destroy them.

Well, the "neos" are on their way out, and the true "cons" are on their way in.

The Democrat Party will soon be reminiscing about the good old days of the pliable neo-cons who would "reach across the aisle" to join them instead of reaching to slap them down like the real Conservatives who are about to join the fray will be doing.

And once these Conservatives get into power. we all need to remind them how they got there, lest they fall to the siren song of Washington power like so many before them and start to "compromise" (i.e. give the Democrats what they want) with the enemy.

Says Who?

2010-09-14T19:52:00.000-07:00

OK, I am hearing nothing but, "Christine O'Donnell can't win" in Delaware. She can't win, she can't win, she can't win...blah, blah, blah ad infinitum.

Says who? The "experts"? The "experts" only go off of what they've seen in the past. And the tectonic shift in the political world is, quite possibly, like nothing that this country has ever seen.

For the past 100 years "progressivism" (aka Communism) has been taking over this country in baby steps, occasionally making headlines, but nothing like the daily barrage of destruction that this country is seeing today. The extreme left has taken over the Democrat Party and has gone "all in" with Obama/Reid/Pelosi. They have abandoned subtlety and pounded their agenda down America's throat with a sledgehammer.

And America is horrified.

As long as the Left stuck to the "boiling frog" tactic of slowly advancing their agenda, not enough people noticed at one time to put up any resistance. But now that huge numbers of people see what Socialism really is, they want no part of it.

And, hopefully, that includes a majority of the voters in Delaware.

Can Christine O'Donnell win in Delaware? I think that it is at least very possible, if not likely.

The rules have changed amazingly fast. And we've entered an era of politics in America that is unlike anything we've ever seen.

Here We Come

2010-09-14T19:30:00.000-07:00

Congratulations to Christine O'Donnell for tearing down Castle in Delaware.

The despicable behavior of the GOP elitist establishment there shows that, by using liberal scorched-earth tactics against O'Donnell, they are nothing more than quasi-liberal elitists themselves.

They did the same thing that liberals do when they feel their power threatened: they try to destroy the person on a personal level.

The GOP elite in Delaware, and nationally, have become nothing more than elitist snobs who believe that they are entitled to their power. They are acting like liberals/six-year-olds because they know that a very significant part of the party will no longer hold their noses and vote for whomever the GOP anoints. Bob Dole, George W. Bush and John McCain have shown us what happens when we do that, and we're having no more of it.

The Conservatives are ascendant in the party, and it scares the Hell out of the elites in the GOP. As well it should: Their reign of foolishness is just about over, and we're coming for them, next.

After this election, we have about a year to oust them before the 2012 campaign starts. Then maybe we can get a real Conservative to run for a change. Remember: that hasn't happened since 1984.

What We Can Look Forward To

2010-09-07T18:50:00.000-07:00

When the Republicans take over the House (and possibly the Senate), and give the business world some optimism (dare I say "hope"?), the economy will start to rebound for real.

When that happens, don't be surprised when the Leftists/Democrats take credit for it by saying that it was their and Obama's policies which were already in place that "just took time" to turn the economy around.

You know it's coming.

This Oughta Be Good

2010-09-07T18:46:00.000-07:00

When the insider "tell-all" books from former White House staffers start coming out, I predict that Michelle Obama's childish sense of entitlement and general nastiness will make Hillary look like Mother Theresa. And that ain't easy to do.

Will they ever learn?

2010-09-04T21:40:00.000-07:00

OK, we'll try to get through again.

All of you fools who voted for Obama, and are now having "buyers remorse", are howling like coyotes about the present state of the union. Really...what did you morons expect? Did you really not think that "hope & change", coming from an extreme left-wing "black liberation", "social justice", Marxist would get us anywhere other than where we are now?

Oh...wait...you fools have no idea what any of those phrases mean, do you? Not a clue. Maybe you should Google them, instead of "Paris Hilton".

Personally, I'd feel like a complete idiot if I had voted for a guy who's record was out there, but that I hadn't bothered to look into, and then started bitching about how horrible he was.

If you can't find the time to look into anyone beyond what you see on the nightly news, you really shouldn't be voting. You're ignorance has made my daughter's chance at a decent life pretty slim. She'll be paying for your decision to vote for Obama because he's "black" (hah!) or he's "cute" or because he "speaks well" (he doesn't speak well...he makes appropriate facial gestures related to what he's reading on the teleprompter).

Really: if you feel a need to vote, stick with "American Idol". It's only your "civic duty" to vote if you know what you're voting for.

Talking Points for the Next 4 Years

2009-01-15T18:14:00.000-08:00

Obama stole the election!
Obama = Hitler!
Obama is responsible for any loss of life due to the weather!
Obama is destroying the environment!
Obama lied, people died!
Obama caused 9/11!
Obama is waging war to enrich his friends!
Joe Biden is the real brains behind Obama!

I really am going to walk around saying this stuff to any Liberal that I happen to meet. Let them know how stupid they sounded for eight years. I'm sure that the humor and irony will be completely lost on them - it's much too complex - but at least I'll be entertained.

Fooling the Fools

2009-01-13T18:35:00.000-08:00

Obama keeping Bush appointees in position? Appointing Washington insiders and/or Clinton cronies to various posts (not to mention Hillary herself)? Going back on his word to close Guantanamo?

Why is anyone surprised? America has just elected a two-bit race hustler from Chicago to the highest office in the land. That's all that he is. The Left and the fools who pay more attention to American Idol than what's really going on in this country have fallen for the biggest con in history.

To those on the Left: don't feel too bad. In one sense Obama really is just like you: his only ideology is whatever gets him more power and attention. Much like the Clintons (and you on the Left) it really is "all about me".

But then, fooling the naive and uninformed is really no great feat, is it?

Any Day Now...

2008-06-19T19:57:00.000-07:00

In view of the recent reports showing that the earth may actually be cooling, how long do you think it will be (or how much money amassed) before Al Gore claims that his initiative solved global warming and averted catastrophe?

I'm thinking that Al "It's All ABout Me" Gore is chafing at Barack Obama taking up all of the lovely, lovely limelight and will have to do something drastic to refocus the spotlight on himself.

He could also use that as an excuse for his ever-expanding carbon footprint:

NASHVILLE - In the year since Al Gore took steps to make his home more energy-efficient, the former Vice President’s home energy use surged more than 10%, according to the Tennessee Center for Policy Research.

“A man’s commitment to his beliefs is best measured by what he does behind the closed doors of his own home,” said Drew Johnson, President of the Tennessee Center for Policy Research. “Al Gore is a hypocrite and a fraud when it comes to his commitment to the environment, judging by his home energy consumption.”

Does anyone need any more proof that Democrats and those on the Left are absolute fools and uninformed morons? After all, this guy is credible in their eyes.

When the Levee Breaks - Or Did It?

2008-06-14T20:25:00.000-07:00

OK - who did it?

While the Cedar River ebbed in hard-hit Cedar Rapids, a levee breach in the state capital of Des Moines flooded a neighborhood of more than 200 homes, a high school and about three dozen businesses.

I think that Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson blew up the levees and destroyed the neighborhood to get rid of all of the white people in Des Moines so that the Democrats could move their people in there and have a reliable voting bloc for themselves.

In fact, it's quite possible that Al Gore engineered the weather to give them cover for their nefarious plan! After all, for a man who invented the internet, a weather machine should be a piece of cake. That would also explain all of this global warming stuff.

Or could it be that when levees fail in black neighborhoods it's a Republican plot, but when they fail in snow-white Des Moines - well - that's just nature taking it's course. Other than the fact that Americans caused the climate to change, I mean.

Question:

2008-06-08T09:01:00.000-07:00

Will the Democrat Party ever be able to nominate a white male for President of the United States again?

NRCC Gets Shelled!

2008-05-17T21:10:00.000-07:00

If the Republican Party doesn't understand the level of discontent in their base after this shellacking, there is no hope of them ever hitting rock-bottom (see post below) and changing course to save themselves.

The comment section on this RNCC blog post is an amazing look at just how upset Conservatives are. If the Republican bigwigs can read this and still think that they have a prayer of winning in November, they are even more deluded than I thought possible.

(Tip o' The Hat to Michelle Malkin)

Time to Stop the Enabling

2008-05-17T20:17:00.000-07:00

When dealing with addicts of any type, there is a term that is often heard: Enabling.

When you help an addict or a drunk solve the problems that result from their bad behavior (i.e. bailing them out of jail, "loaning" them money, etc.) you are doing nothing more than prolonging their suffering. You are "enabling" them to continue their destructive behavior. If it's done long enough, it often results in that persons death.

Since 1988, when Ronald Reagan left office, most of us have "held our noses" and voted for people who were not Conservatives. And, not coincidentally, the Republican Party has slid farther and farther to the Left. To the point where the Republican Party is on the verge of officially nominating a man who has again and again and again betrayed the principles that were the hallmarks of the Republican party.

When the Republicans were given power in 1994 they started off well, but slowly-but-surely they became addicted to the lure of money and power until the year 2000 when many of us, with some trepidation, voted for George W. Bush. After that, with absolute power, their death-spiral of addictive behavior accelerated - as it always does with addicts. And, also as with addicts, their behavior became more and more destructive; not just to themselves (via their morals and integrity), but to others - in this case the entire country.

In other words, those of us who have "held our noses" and voted for Bush I, Bob Dole, and Bush II (not to mention many other Senators and Congressmen) have been enabling the destructive behavior of these liberal Republicans. To the point where there is a very real danger to the very country that we live in.

There is another term in the treatment of addicts that comes in handy here: Rock-bottom.

Most addicts will only get help when they have hit rock-bottom. When they have lost everything that they care about and their lives are an absolute disaster.

And when you enable an addict you never let them get to that rock bottom. You keep them from hitting that place where they have to decide whether they want to change their behavior or die.

It's always very, very hard to do, but the most loving thing that you can do for someone in that situation is to take away all of the support that you've been giving them and let them crash and burn - praying that the fall doesn't kill them.

And now it's time to quit holding our noses and voting for the lesser of two evils. When we have reached the point of nominating a Republican who has voted like a Liberal Democrat for years and stabbed the very people who supported him in the back time and time again (another hallmark of addictive behavior), it's obvious that we're no longer helping the Republican party by enabling their bad behavior. It's time to let them hit bottom.

I will not vote for John McCain. Not for so much as dog-catcher. He is a symptom of the disease of Liberalism which has infected the Republican party. Like alcoholism, it's a chronic, progressive (heh) disease and it will only get worse if allowed to do so.

Nor will I vote for Senator Norm Coleman. In his run against the presumed Democrat nominee, Al Franken, the two have become almost indistinguishable (except that, as far as I know, Coleman pays his taxes before he advocates raising them on the rest of us).

For now, at least, I wash my hands of the Republican Party. It's time to let them sink or swim. If we continue to support them, they will never hit bottom and be forced to decide on a new course.

Let's See How This Flies...

2008-04-07T18:43:00.000-07:00

Since it was the Democrats* who relentlessly fought for slavery, Jim Crow laws and against civil rights for blacks, why don't we have everyone who has consistently voted Democrat in this country pay "reparations" to the "black community"?

After all, blacks argue that they deserve reparations because of the suffering that they endured and the free labor that they did, right? Well, the people who caused that suffering and kept them in slavery were Democrats. Hence, the people who caused the suffering should be the ones to pay.

That would be one issue that we'd never hear about again.

* If you've never been to Stop the Republicans, it is a MUST read! It is a detailed timeline of the despicable lengths that the Democrat Party went to keep blacks in this country enslaved from 1854 until the present. And it shows without any doubt that it was always the Republican Party that was fighting for freedom for black people. The fact that most people have little or no idea of this history shows the Orwellian twist that only Leftists can put on an issue.

It is an incredibly valuable resource any time you hear the word "Republican" being equated with "racist".

Here's a sample:

November 18, 1872
Susan B. Anthony arrested for voting, after boasting to Elizabeth Cady Stanton that she voted for “the Republican ticket, straight”

January 17, 1874
Armed Democrats seize Texas state government, ending Republican efforts to racially integrate government

September 14, 1874
Democrat white supremacists seize Louisiana statehouse in attempt to overthrow racially-integrated administration of Republican Governor William Kellogg; 27 killed

March 1, 1875
Civil Rights Act of 1875, guaranteeing access to public accommodations without regard to race, signed by Republican President U.S. Grant; passed with 92% Republican support over 100% Democrat opposition

"Progress" Doesn't Mean What You Think It Does

2008-03-28T21:38:00.000-07:00

I hear a lot of Conservatives ridiculing "Progressives" for seeming to be against progress. After all, everything that they do seems to go against any real progress as you and I define the term. In fact, their entire philosophy is rooted in the long-dead mind of a Leftist misfit who lived over 100 years ago. How's that for progress?

But to understand how a Leftist defines progress you only need to remember one thing: Socialism was an imperfect but necessary step in progressing to the "perfection" of real Communism.

In the old Soviet Union, where the population was constantly inundated with short, propagandistic slogans (now, who has the "bumper sticker" ideology?), one of the most prevalent consisted of the word 'Progress!'

In fact, during the Soyuz space station days, the space vehicle used to resupply the station was even named Progress.

Their entire system was designed to create the conditions necessary to progress towards International Socialism first and, eventually, to real Communism where every person was exactly the equal of (i.e. the same as) the next. Little robots that the State could use (and destroy) however it saw fit.

And so, when you hear anyone calling themselves a "progressive", trying to see in their ideology what any sane person would call progress is utterly futile. It's apples and oranges. We're not speaking of the same thing.

We're speaking of the betterment of mankind in terms of liberty, freedom, science, etc.

They're speaking in terms of the progression of mankind to be servants of the State.

Could It Be?

2008-03-28T21:24:00.000-07:00

Is it possible that the "Man-made Global Warming" hysteria has peaked and we're finally getting a little common sense out there? If this decision by the EPA is any indication, maybe so.

From The Heritage Foundation:

Liberals in Congress and environmentalists are predictably apoplectic over the Environmental Protection Agency’s decision to seek public comment before issuing regulations under the Clean Air Act on carbon emissions. House Energy Independence and Global Warming Chairman Ed Markey (D-Mass.) accused the Bush administration of “running out the clock” on global warming, and Senate Environment and Public Works Chairwoman Barbara Boxer (D-Calif.) said the EPA has had nearly year since the Supreme Court directed the agency to act on carbon emissions but, “now, instead of action, we get more foot-dragging.”

Al Gore may want to reconsider that bid for the White House. If the word's finally getting out that all of this is based on junk science and is nothing more than a Socialist power-grab, he may need a new job soon.

The State of Conservatism

2008-02-28T07:09:00.001-08:00

I think that Mr. Buckley died just so that he could roll over in his grave at what "Conservatism" has become.

Two Questions

2008-02-27T07:12:00.000-08:00

1) Will Hillary cry in public when she has to admit that her lifelong dream has been snatched away from her at the last minute?

2) Who will she blame it on? We know for a fact that she'll take no responsibility for it.

Global Warming?

2008-01-30T09:42:00.001-08:00

As far as I'm concerned, Al Gore can come up here and lick my flagpole!

"Believing" - Until You Don't Need To

2008-01-27T11:02:00.000-08:00

What ever happened to John Ashcroft who was, once upon a time, the most hated and evil man in the world? At least by Democrats.

Or Karl Rove, for that matter?

These two (and many others) were the subject of thousands of screeching, daily rants warning the American people of how they were going to (literally, in Ashcroft's case) bring Armageddon down upon the world.

Funny, but you hardly ever hear about either of them any more. You only hear about Rove because he writes a column for Newsweak magazine. John Ashcroft may as well have gone on to his reward for as much as the Left mentions him anymore.

Could it be that maybe the Left didn't really believe that these guys were as bad as they said they were? I doubt it. At least during the time that they were shuddering in fear over these "evil, warmongering, Christian haters", they believed every word that spewed from their spittle-flecked lips.

It's just another sign of the Orwellian insanity of being a Leftist that they truly believed that John Ashcroft was the Antichrist - until he no longer threatened their power or policies. Once he no longer threatened them, he became just another human being, no longer imbued with the power to destroy the earth.

And I'd bet that not one of them made the connection between their irrational hatred, their political ideology and the fact that John Ashcroft abruptly disappeared from their radar screen. Once Ashcroft stepped down, he became a non-person. He disappeared - just like mommy does, in an infant's mind, when she leaves the room.

When a Leftist hates someone, it is always in a self-righteous, "I'm going to personally help save the world from this person" point of view. They use the worst epithets that they can possibly think of to describe them, and they believe every word that they are saying at the time.

And then, when this evil person goes off and retires, the Leftists apparently lose the belief that something needs to be done about them. Karl Rove apparently chose being a columnist over world domination.

To be a Liberal is to be completely deranged.

X Ray Spex - Germfree Adolescent

2008-01-18T18:45:00.000-08:00

3-Ring Circus

2008-01-17T18:01:00.000-08:00

Appearances and Ann Coulter's joke about him notwithstanding, its really too bad that John Edwards isn't gay. Think about it: they'd have all three of their biggest victims groups represented - women, blacks and gays.

Watching Hillary (via her subordinates, of course) try to call Barack Obama a "nigger" and still maintain her elitist liberal image is absolutely fascinating. Especially when you consider that Obama has, as far as I know, never once tried to use the race card. In this day and age, when blacks go ballistic over things that have nothing to do with race (i.e. "niggardly") that's unheard of. I give him all the credit in the world for that.

It's not that Obama doesn't actually believe that blacks are a horribly oppressed minority in this country, as evidenced by the racist church to which he belongs. Hell, he wouldn't be a liberal if he didn't believe in the supposed inherent racism in this country. But he has managed to restrain himself on the campaign trail at least.

And then you have Hillary and her fellow man-hating feminist travelers whining about the boys picking on her and not giving her a level playing field to play on. At least when she isn't crying like a little girl.

(I, for one, believe that her tears were completely real: after 35 years of plotting to become the first female President, her dream looked as if it were crumbling within 11 months of achieving it.)

If only John Edwards really was gay, we could have the pleasure of watching him whine about getting the shaft (sorry, couldn't resist) because of his sexual orientation and attacking Obama for being a man. And attacking Hillary for being even more of a man (except when she's crying).

The Democrats are showing their true colors in this race: after decades of preaching to us about how tolerant they are towards others, their power-at-all-costs mentality comes shining through in their attacks on one another regarding the very things which they'd like us to think they are tolerant of.

We on the Right always knew that they were a bunch of lying hypocrites. Now the rest of the country gets to see it, too.

Wanted: Adult Moderator

2007-12-13T17:54:00.000-08:00

Everyone who believes in global warming, raise your hand!

A few years back, my daughter used to do that: "Whoever wants ice cream, raise your hand!"

If the Dhimmocrats want to use their fellow children as moderators, all well and good. But when are Republicans just going to say, "enough!"?

Good for Fred Thompson for finally putting the hostile little girl from The Des Moines Register in her place. When Liberals act like nasty little children, they should be treated like nasty little children.

It's just too bad that they waited until the last debate. They all should have done that from the beginning.

At the very least, Republicans should insist on at least one moderator in each debate who isn't a liberal trying to make Republicans look bad.

That way, we'd at least have some adult supervision.

Gee...What a Shock

2007-12-10T16:29:00.000-08:00

Nobody on the Right will be surprised that Al Gore is willing to sacrifice the economy of America, the freedom of Americans and God only knows how many lives in third-world countries for his insatiable ego. After all, he's a Liberal. And, given the chance, that is what all Liberals would do.

Al Gore has come under fire for making personal gain from his mission to save the planet – after charging £3,300 a minute to deliver a poorly received speech.

The former American Vice-President was also accused of being "precious" at the London event, demanding his own VIP room and ejecting journalists, despite hopes the star-studded gathering would generate publicity for the fight against global warming.
...
"Al uses his position for great personal gain. He goes from event to event delivering a similar speech, earning a large fee, and a lot of the time he doesn't actually inform the audience.
"He refused to speak to journalists and security would usher away VIP guests and the Press.
"He was being very precious and demanded his own VIP room before the event, where he held his own exclusive reception.
"The other guests were cut off. It was very clear that many guests were disappointed by this."

The only people who will be surprised by this are his fellow disciples/Liberals who believe that Saint Algore can do no wrong. They are, of course, the same people who were surprised every time that Bill and Hillary were caught lying.

They are, of course, the same people whom Lenin called "useful idiots".

But...That's Different!

2007-12-04T12:04:00.000-08:00

Let me guess: The National Intelligence Estimate saying that Iran has stopped it's nuclear-weapons program will be taken as Gospel by the Left.

But, the intelligence that said that Sadaam Hussein had WMD's was "cooked up" by the Bush Administration as an excuse to attack Iraq and steal all of their oil (which, by the way, we seem to be still waiting for...).

And yet, the Liberals will see no contradiction whatsoever.

Liberalism is truly a mental disorder.

Start the Clock!

2007-11-30T12:00:00.000-08:00

It's been about half an hour since this began. Has anyone on the Left blamed Rush Limbaugh yet?

ROCHESTER, N.H. - A man claiming to have a bomb walked into Hillary Rodham Clinton's storefront campaign office Friday and took at least two hostages, police and witnesses said.

What's Goin' On?

2007-11-29T17:18:00.000-08:00

Rarely does one sentence sum up our situation as much as this one does:

WASHINGTON - The Marines plan to buy fewer bomb-resistant vehicles than planned despite pressure from lawmakers who are determined to spend billions of dollars on the vehicles.

Nowhere in the story does it even hint that part of the reason is that IED attacks have plummeted, and that we may be seeing the beginning of the end of the Iraq campaign in the War against the Islamist death cult.

And, of course, the sickening part about pork-hungry politicians who are "determined" (!) to spend millions of dollars of our tax money on things that the Marines don't even want, just to keep the campaign contributions flowing in.

I don't know who's more disgusting, the press or the politicians.

The Joys of a Complete Lack of Memory

2007-11-27T19:11:00.000-08:00

Correct me if I'm wrong (although I know that I'm not), but wasn't it just a few years ago that liberals were all in a tither about banks not giving loans to "low-income" (just like "inner-city", "low-income" is Libspeak for "minority") borrowers?

The Libs, ignoring the reality of the situation as they always do, were up in arms because loan applications from minorities were being rejected more often than those from non-minority applicants (which, as usual, includes Asians, who are a minority in this country). It never occurred to these Leftist morons that the banks were rejecting applications based on income and credit status and not on race.

And so, under threat of legislation and penalty, lenders were forced to give home loans to people who really had no business buying a house, regardless of race.

And now the housing market has gone bad (or, more accurately, back to normal), interest rates have risen, equity has plummeted, and people with Adjustable Rate Mortgages are being foreclosed upon because they can't pay their mortgages. Why? Because many of them are...low income earners!

So who's fault is it that these people took out loans that they couldn't afford? Is it Jesse Jackson and the rest of the left-wing race-industry's fault for strong-arming banks into giving these people loans that they should never have taken out in the first place?

Don't be silly. Nothing is ever the result of bad decisions made by liberals. Their role in the whole matter has been thrown down the memory-hole, never to be seen again.

No, it's all the fault of "predatory lenders" who were "greedily" fooling stupid low-income people into buying houses that they couldn't afford. The borrowers weren't at fault. In the eyes of the Left, poor equals stupid and easily-fooled (they do, after all, vote for Democrats). They just didn't know what they were getting into. There were too many words on the papers that told them what would happen if they didn't pay the loan.

The Liberal/Democrat Party should really rename itself the Wile E. Coyote Party: they get a bright idea, implement it, and it backfires with disastrous results. And, like Wile E. Coyote, the damage is immediately forgotten and it's on to the next foolish idea - which will also blow up in their face and be forgotten. Ad infinitum.

The only difference is that Wile E. Coyote doesn't blame the ACME company for his bad decisions.

Only in the StarTribune

2007-11-16T14:44:00.000-08:00

Just a little story that I noticed in the world's most Leftist newspaper.

Police: Bus stop attack was a hate crime

A woman attacked at a bus stop in St. Paul on Monday was the victim of a hate crime, police said.

Cut in the face with a knife, the woman was taken to Regions Hospital in St. Paul and treated for a laceration. Police said she was not seriously injured.

The suspect, who was arrested on suspicion of felony assault, approached the victim at a bus stop on the 800 block of Payne Avenue in St. Paul near York Avenue, police said.

He started yelling at her for no apparent reason, used racial slurs and told her to "get out of here," police said. Then he left the scene but came back with a knife and said,"I thought I told you to leave." He then attacked her with a knife, police said.

According to court documents, the suspect has an extensive record.

Police said the investigation is ongoing.

First of all, let's note that the neighborhood is in what we would call a "bad part of town". And that's putting it mildly.

Isn't it odd that, other than mentioning "racial slurs", the story never mentions why it's being considered a hate crime? No mention of either person's race at all. Wouldn't any normal person think that that little piece of information might relate to the story?

If you know the StarTribune, it doesn't take much thought to realize exactly who the suspect is: a member of one of their favored minority classes of whom nothing derogatory shall ever be said. If the victim were a white male, I guarantee you that you'd know about it. Mostly because the story would cover half of the front page, rather than a tiny story on page 8 of the "B" section.

On the bright side, the police were allowed to label it a hate crime. That in itself is somewhat amazing when you consider the fact that St. Paul is just slightly to the right of Minneapolis, which is slightly to the Left of Moscow in the heyday of the Soviet Union

Nothing Shocking Here

2007-11-16T14:26:00.000-08:00

Saudi court hands jail term, doubles lashes for victim of gang rape

Riyadh, Saudi Arabia: A Saudi court sentenced a 19-year-old woman victim of gang rape to six months in jail and 200 lashes — more than double than in her initial sentence for being in the car of a man who was not her relative, a newspaper reported Thursday.

Nothing shocking there.

And here's the link to the story on the National Organization for Women's website:

Oh, wait. There isn't one.

Nothing shocking there, either.

The Logical End of the Democrats

2007-11-04T07:47:00.000-08:00

They'll take it all...

Letter on "extra-hard assignments" for independent farmers from M. Ye. Boncharnikova, Central Black Earth Oblast, 1932

The rural commission gave us the extra-hard assignment of [delivering] 150 poods of grain: a hundred poods of winter wheat and fifty poods of spring-sown wheat. I wasn't able to fulfill such an assignment in view of the fact that there are three in my family and we have three plots of land. . . in all fifteen sazhens. I delivered fifteen poods of grain, and that's the most I can do. . . . My husband is an old man of sixty eight, unfit for work, and my boy is twelve, and I'm forty seven. The commission didn't take our circumstances into consideration. They took our horse with its harness, the new harness we purchased and the young horse, our seven sheep, twenty five poods of flour, two fur coats, two homespun coats, twelve arshins of ordinary cloth for leg wraps, one pair of felt leg wrappings, one curried hide, two pair of warm women's boots, one pair of leather men's boots, nine pieces of sun-bleached linen, four warm shawls, two sarafans, two mugs, four knives, two ropes, and so forth. When they came to take all these things, my husband wasn't home. I didn't want to let them take them. They hit me and tied me up, lay me face down and abused me. . . . They left me with nothing to my soul and they also took the seven solid boards that we had ready for our coffins, and one saddle and thirteen hens. I petition . . . to restore my house to me, that is, my hut, and return the property of mine indicated above.

- Stalinism as a Way of Life co-edited by Lewis Siegelbaum and Andrei Sokolov

If you want to see where the Democrat/Leftists are taking us, you need to read this book of letters and reports from Soviet archives. The Hell that these people went through, with the help of the useful idiots in this country, is astounding.

The Comparisons Are Amazing

2007-10-26T07:07:00.001-07:00

Just one more way that the Islamofascists and Liberals resemble twin theologies:

CAIRO, Egypt - Al-Qaida sympathizers have unleashed a torrent of anger against Al-Jazeera television, accusing it of misrepresenting Osama bin Laden's latest audiotape by airing excerpts in which he criticizes mistakes by insurgents in Iraq.

Users of a leading Islamic militant Web forum posted thousands of insults against the pan-Arab station for focusing on excerpts in which bin Laden criticizes insurgents, including his followers.

No matter how loyal you've been in the past, if you step out of line and criticize any part of the agenda, you are attacked (see Larry Summers).

It's just incredible how closely the two resemble each other. Or maybe it's not so incredible when you really think about it.

Harry Election Ahead!

2007-10-23T18:24:00.000-07:00

Maybe now he'll finally put a lid on it:

The surprise was in the degree of voter disenchantment. The poll commissioned by the Las Vegas Review-Journal showed Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid's unfavorable rating had moved past the 50 percent mark -- 51 percent, to be precise. His favorable rating was 32 percent, 2 points lower than embattled, lame duck President George W. Bush.

Now that he's looking at losing the most precious thing in his life - power - I'd almost bet that we don't hear much more out of Harry Reid from now on.

Almost.

Top 10 Reasons the Left Hates Ann Coulter

2007-10-16T19:20:00.000-07:00

10. She's tougher than they are - both their "men" and their women.

9. She points out their faults - they hate that.

8. She looks better in a dress than they do - both their "men" and their women.

7. She's smarter and more clever than they are - and not afraid to rub it in.

6. She has fun poking them with sticks through the bars of their cages.

5. She's not the least bit intimidated by them.

4. She sneers at them.

3. She makes fun of them.

2. She ridicules them.

1. She right about them.

Ann Coulter embodies the people that tormented those who have become Liberals all through their lives. She brings back the unbearable memories of having their self-esteem devastated all through their formative years (why do you think that they're so obsessed with self-esteem in the government schools today?).

Ann Coulter is like an unquiet ghost from their past that endlessly haunts them.

White Like Me

2007-10-16T19:14:00.000-07:00

No matter who ends up running in the next election, I am going to vote for a white male.

Pretty racist & sexist, huh?

But millions of black people will vote for Barack Obama for no other reason than he's black.

And millions of women will vote for Hillary Clinton for no other reason than she's female.

So why wouldn't I vote only for a person whose skin-color and genitalia match my own?

Because I'm not an idiot, that's why.

Once a Loser...

2007-10-13T14:38:00.000-07:00

Why would the Democrats back a Presidential candidate as psychologically damaged as Hillary Clinton? Why would they back someone power-obsessed to the point that she has broken numerous laws, given new meaning to the words "dirty politics" and stood by her husband as he humiliated her because she just had to be a politician? Part of it is that most of them can relate to that kind of lack of morals. But there's a bigger reason:

They think that she can win.

Think about exactly when the Democrats went completely off the rails. It was the second that President Bush won the Presidential election in November of 2000. Even while the recount was going on, most of them knew that Bush had won, whether they wanted to admit it or not.

It was bad enough for them when Republicans took control of Congress in 1994, but when we took the White House too, it propelled them back in time to their miserable childhoods, when they always lost at everything - physically, socially, academically - you name it. Living life as perpetual losers and misfits is, in fact, what made them into the Leftists that they are today. Just look at any anti-Bush - err, anti-war - protest and you'll recognize the same losers that you went to school with.

They can't bear to lose again. If they're not actually psychotic at this point, they would certainly be so after another loss. It would bring back just too many bad memories and, of course, make them feel bad.

And they figure that they've had enough of that for one lifetime.

And so, they're willing to ignore what an absolute scumbag they would be putting back into the White House. Not to mention Hillary's felonious husband. They don''t care. To them, the end always justifies the means.

Especially when it keeps them from reliving the Hell of their depressing childhoods.

First Comes the Purge

2007-10-05T17:37:00.000-07:00

The Left is going after Rush Limbaugh, Clarence Thomas, General Petraeus, Bill O'Reilly and a thousand others with both barrels. Nobody should be surprised: purges are so much a part of their ideology that they may as well be part of the Left's DNA.

There has never been a Leftist organization that didn't feature a good, old-fashioned purge. In fact, they are usually a recurring thing, happening whenever someone new takes (or is trying to take) power. Real elections and the orderly transfer of power doesn't work in a Leftist society. You have to murder (sometimes figuratively but, more often, literally) your rival political enemies. If they thought they could get away with it, those on the Left would have already put all of those mentioned above up against the wall and shot them.

Leftist "revolutions" always start with the purging of those who are not on the Left (they eventually begin infighting and killing other Leftists with differing viewpoints, but that's another post). The lucky ones are sent to "re-education camps" where they are tortured and brutalized. The not-so-lucky ones are murdered outright because their ideas and their stature threaten the Leftists. Truth and ideas are just as threatening to the Left as guns and soldiers.

Make no mistake: Harry Reid, Nancy Pelosi, Hillary Clinton, Noam Chomsky, and the rest of the cold, dead-eyed, hate-filled Leftists in positions of power are exactly the kind of people who have ordered such purges* in the past. And the mindless, shrieking, hysterical dolts who follow them (you can see them at any anti-war protest) are exactly the kind of people who carried out those orders.

What would be frightening if I thought that it were true, is that many of these people apparently believe that we are on the verge of a new "revolution". They mistake the volume of their howling for actual numbers. They make so much noise that they seem to honestly believe that the entire country (other than the Conservatives, of course - you can't have a revolution without a demon to blame all troubles on) is howling along with them. Another thing about Leftists is that they never learn from history. Eventually, as in the 1960's and 70's, they will go too far and they will find that the American people are anything but on their side. We will run out of tolerance and patience and marginalize them into even more complete irrelevance just as we did 30 years ago.

But a large portion of them do believe that their lust for power over others is about to be satisfied. They have control of Congress and believe that the White House is theirs for the taking. And that is why they are attacking their enemies with even more visciousness and lying than usual (and you didn't think that it was possible!). They're gleefully warming up for the inevitable purge.

*That link is from The National Review, April 1977 - 2 years after we had left Vietnam. If you need a refresher on what happened after we surrendered (or "redeployed" as the Democrats like to sweeten it up), it's a great article, as is the website it comes from.

Ruh roh!

2007-10-05T17:33:00.000-07:00

Only a Lib

2007-10-03T09:36:00.000-07:00

Let's see...Rush Limbaugh has done nothing but praise and support the troops for the past 20 years.

Suddenly, one day, he decides to insult them?

Only a Liberal could be stupid enough to find any logic in that.

Marcel Marceau Obituary

2007-09-24T09:57:00.000-07:00

...

IED = Coward

2007-09-22T18:37:00.000-07:00

This is the way that cowards, who are supposedly willing to die for Allah, fight. If they were so sure of those 72 virgins awaiting them, why would they use remote detonators instead of fighting to-to-toe like real men?

Luckily, they missed.

The End of the World

2007-09-22T18:26:00.000-07:00

Do you realize that if any of the current crop of Democrat Presidential hopefuls wins, America will have a President that is farther to the Left than France's President???

God, please help us.

No Joke

2007-09-22T18:20:00.001-07:00

Q: How many Liberals does it take to screw in a light bulb?

A: Just one - they hold the light bulb and the world revolves around them.

The "Men" of the Left

2007-09-19T16:08:00.000-07:00

It's no wonder that the Left could never get their "Revolution" started. This guy is a representative of their foot soldiers. I'd be more afraid of a bunch of 5th grade girls.

Excuse the vulgarity, but what a pussy!

In the beginning of the video you get the loudmouthed, self-righteous arrogance that only the ill-informed Leftist can seem to muster. You get the conspiracy theories of "rigged" elections and "Skull and Bones" and, of course the "impeach Bush" comments. I'd say that he's almost a stereotypical useful idiot but, when they all act the same, is it really a stereotype?

Then you get the "Don't tase me, bro!" comment. What a moron! If you're down on the ground being held by a bunch of cops and you can't finish a sentence without using the word 'bro', your extremely low I.Q. is painfully obvious to all. These are the people who actually believe that they're the "intellectual elite".

If I was a cop, I would have tased him just because of that stupid comment. If you look at the video, I'm not so sure that wasn't the case.

And then you get a minute of him squealing like a little girl: "Ohhh! Ohhhhh! Oh God! Ohhhhhhhh! Oh God!" Come to think of it, that's probably what his cell-mate heard from him in jail, too.

But he is one of the "men" of the Left. Most of their women are tougher than they are. Hell, my eight-year-old daughter is tougher than he is.

It's Time To Pull Out

2007-09-13T19:14:00.000-07:00

Yes, I have finally reached the point where I agree with the Left: it’s time to pull out.

Time to pull out of the U.N.

They're worse than useless: they actually harm the very people whom they profess to protect. It's nothing more than a corrupt men's club for tyrants, dictators and/or genocidal terrorist nations.

We're wasting our time and money there. It's time to start a new organization that's dedicated to upholding real human rights, freedom and Democracy.

Time to pull out of the Geneva Convention.

Why not? America and its allies are the only countries that pay anything more than lip-service to it anyway.

China holds our pilots in direct contradiction to the Geneva Convention, Iran takes British sailors hostage in direct contradiction to the Geneva Convention, Palestinians, Al Qaeda and Hezbollah hide amongst civilians to escape retribution for intentionally killing other civilians - and I'm pretty sure that beheading your hostages isn't approved anywhere in the articles of the Convention.

The Geneva Convention only works when fighting civilized people. The U.N. only works when it's being run by civilized people. Neither are true today. Both institutions are being used against us by a bunch of savages (and that includes Communist countries such as China).

We don't need (or want) to turn into mirror images of those savages, but there's no reason that we should enable - or dignify - these reprobates by attending their meetings or adhering to archaic rules that force us to let known enemy combatants go free.

Once upon a time there was an organization called The League of Nations. It was the predecessor of the United Nations. It failed and was disbanded. The U.N. has obviously failed, but too many people make too much money from it for it to ever be disbanded.

But that doesn't mean that those of us who believe in truth and freedom can't secede.

He Knows His Audience

2007-09-11T10:19:00.000-07:00

Besides the Democrat talking points in Osama bin Laden's latest video, did you notice anything else that was different?

He didn't have the rifle next to him like he usually does in these videos.

He'll probably start lecturing us on gun-control next. He loves those Democrats!

There's No Such Thing As a Dumb Question...

2007-09-10T17:27:00.000-07:00

Unless you're listening to Democrat politicians grandstanding to their moronic, extremist supporters during a hearing in Congress. And, judging by the questions put to General Petraeus and Ambassador Crocker today, the Democrat politicians aren't much more intelligent.

I would sell my soul to, just once, see someone being interrogated by the likes of Loretta Sanchez, Teddy Kennedy or Barbara Boxer say, "That's a stupid question. Why don't you quit playing to the Kos Kids so that we can get on with this serious business at hand?".

The shrieks of self-righteous, arrogant outrage would be music to the ears of Conservatives, Republicans and, I'm sure, a huge portion of middle America. I guarantee you that the general reaction would be, "It's about time!" The reason that the approval ratings of Congress are so low is that they are seen as arrogant rulers who are not to be questioned by anyone whom they deem to be "beneath" them.

The beauty of it would be that it would be just too juicy for the 24/7 news networks not to play over and over again, showing these people for exactly who they are.

Of course, that person would never be confirmed to anything by the ruling party, but so what? Some day the administration should put somebody up for some confirmation (Attorney General?) who doesn't care whether they get the job or not, just to make that statement.

It'll never happen, of course. It doesn't matter how vicious, insulting and nasty the Democrats get, the Republicans just refuse to play hardball - or even to point out their nastiness. They just sit there and pretend that their honor hasn't just been insulted. They just answer the question.

The Democrats in Congress are no different than the Democrats in the "real world": they are children. And, when they aren't called on their childish behavior, they smirkingly feel like they just got away with something. If, some day, Republicans had the nerve to point out their childishness, the resulting ugly tantrum that they'd throw would be invaluable for showing people just whom they are voting for.

Bumper Sticker Party

2007-09-10T16:56:00.000-07:00

Many years before John Edwards called the War on Terror a "bumper sticker war" I noticed that if the car in front of you was covered in bumper stickers, nine-out-of-ten times they were Lefty slogans.

And, more often or not, they were on rusty, old pieces of junk belching out blue smoke into our fragile atmosphere. Maybe not as much as Al Gore's Lear jet trips, but the stupidity and/or blindness to their own hypocrisy is the same.

For lack of anything better to do, and simple curiosity, I did an image search on Yahoo! for "bumper sticker". It was really no surprise when I found that almost every one that had anything to do with politics was from the Leftist point of view:

It's no surprise. As I've always said, for all of their talk of being the "intellectual elite", the vast majority of those on the Left are too stupid to realize how stupid they are. Any argument much beyond "Cheney is Satan" immediately confuses them.

It's the reason that they have no ideas. It's the reason that any "debate" with them shortly turns into sneering false-condescension (born of their insecurity) and personal insults on their part.

It's possible that some of them are actually somewhat intelligent...but they don't know how to think. And the two things are not the same.

The Mote in Her Eye

2007-09-08T17:44:00.000-07:00

Steve Sack's Aug. 31 cartoon of Fred Thompson "testing the waters" makes me wonder how the ex-senator would govern if he became president. Although it became obvious to everyone that Thompson has been running for president, he refused for months to declare his candidacy so he could maintain secrecy about contributions and not have to abide by the rules that govern declared candidates. Secrecy and disregard for the rule of law have been hallmarks of the Bush administration. The last thing this country needs is more of the same.
- MARY VRABEL, MINNEAPOLIS

How much do you want to bet that this dolt voted for Bill Clinton - twice! - in the 1990's? And how much do you want to bet that, if Hillary is nominated by the Democrat Party, Mary will vote for her, too?

It can't be conscious hypocrisy. It has to be just plain stupidity.

Welcome to the world of the Minneapolis Star-Tribune's Letters to the Editor page. If you're ever out of material for your blog, it's a goldmine.

UPDATE: After a brief search, Mary Vrabel's name just happens to turn up on Peacemakersite.org's list of grant recipients. She's apparently (surprise!) a public school teacher in Minneapolis. It's no wonder that she's blinded by ideology when she's getting financial help from a group who gives out money for things like "Restorative Circles", "Bullying prevention", "Respect", "Anger management" and every other left-wing, feel-good fad out there.

Is it any wonder that inner-city schools are crap?

Absloute Proof of MSM Bias

2007-09-07T22:00:00.000-07:00

Osama:

"It has now become clear to you and the entire world the impotence of the democratic system and how it plays with the interests of the peoples and their blood by sacrificing soldiers and populations to achieve the interests of the major corporations..."
"the reeling of many of you under the burden of interest-related debts, insane taxes and real estate mortgages; global warming and its woes..."

Is it just me, or is everything that Osama bin Laden said the exact same things that Democrat voters read and hear - and believe - in the MSM every day?

Could it be that bin Laden has been closely following the problems with "real estate mortgages" in America?

Osama, like the Democrat voters in this country, apparently has no idea that the media from which they get their "news" is completely biased towards the Democrats. His belief that the MSM in this country actually represents what most people think proves that they absolutely dominate the "news" that comes from America.

Its no wonder that he endorses the Democrat Party.

Who is More Disgusting?

2007-09-07T21:40:00.000-07:00

It's hard to know who to dislike more: the racists or the Socialist:

When Steve Cohen, a white man, was elected last year to represent mostly black Memphis in Congress, it was seen as a sign that racial divisions were fading in this Southern city.
But less than a year later, Cohen is facing a movement led by black pastors and political activists to defeat him in 2008 and send a black representative to Washington instead.
"He's not black, and he can't represent me. That's the bottom line," the Rev. Robert Poindexter told a local newspaper after a meeting last week of the Memphis Baptist Ministerial Association at which Cohen was jeered and booed.

The black preachers have other grudges against Cohen: He was the primary force behind the creation of the lottery in Tennessee; he spoke out against a state constitutional amendment banning gay marriage; and he complained about a reference to Jesus in a prayer before a state Senate session.

Hard to pick sides on that one. The ideological stupidity kind of cancels each side out.

The Conservative Wrench in the Works

2007-09-07T21:28:00.000-07:00

Those on the Left live every day sleepwalking through life in their Utopian dream of a perfect world.

We on the Right are the train passing in the night, the airplane flying overhead, the barking dog, the thunderstorm that threatens to wake them from their dream and bring them back to hated reality.

That is why they hate us.

Queer Eye for the Muslim Guy

2007-09-07T21:16:00.000-07:00

I really don't have anything to say about the whole "beard thing". I just wanted to use that header on a post.

Explaining the War Protestors

2007-08-31T06:42:00.000-07:00

To abjure violence it is necessary to have no experience of it.”
- George Orwell

It's Already Started

2007-08-29T19:36:00.000-07:00

26 days ago, I put up a post about Hillary Clinton's probable Presidency and the inevitable scandals that would ensue:

To make a long story short, if she is elected President, the first Clinton Presidency is probably going to look tame compared to hers. Hillary's arrogance, paranoia, greed and hatred will drive her to do things that will result in an unending series of scandals that the Right will be only too happy to go after her for.

I should have known that it wouldn't take that long for a Clinton to be caught breaking the law:

DALY CITY, Calif. -- One of the biggest sources of political donations to Hillary Rodham Clinton is a tiny, lime-green bungalow that lies under the flight path from San Francisco International Airport.

Six members of the Paw family, each listing the house at 41 Shelbourne Ave. as their residence, have donated a combined $45,000 to the Democratic senator from New York since 2005, for her presidential campaign, her Senate re-election last year and her political action committee. In all, the six Paws have donated a total of $200,000 to Democratic candidates since 2005, election records show.

A word of warning to the Democrat Party: If you elect a woman who believes that her "vision" for America trumps the law (i.e. the end justifies the means), she will be impeached, and she will be convicted. She truly believes that she is above the law. Anyone who is that arrogant will inevitably leave evidence of their wrongdoing, because they will be incapable of seeing it as wrong. The Constitution is meaningless to someone like her, because she knows what is best.

It's pathological narcissism.

Well, That Didn't Help

2007-08-28T19:49:00.000-07:00

So Michael Vick has suddenly found God.

That was stupid.

To those of a religious persuasion, it was an insult that he should have a sudden "death row conversion" when his career was on the line. It was about as believable as the huge 50 pound mega-Bible that Bill Clinton used to carry around so that the cameras didn't think that he was carrying a copy of Hustler out of church.

And for the atheistic Left, the mere mention of the "G-word" was enough to doom him in the Liberal MSM. He'll never get another word of sympathy from them. I'm sure that they didn't believe him either, but he brought religion up on national TV, where some hick might actually believe him and look into that whole "God thing" for themselves. After all, if these people are stupid enough to watch football instead of bad off-Broadway plays, they can be easily duped into anything!

No, Michael, the correct play would have been to make a huge donation to PETA as penance for harming an animal, and then buy a Prius and profess your devotion to "the savior" Al Gore.

They still wouldn't believe you, but that doesn't matter. They don't really believe in any of it themselves. The important thing would be the money and the publicity for the "cause" of Global Warming, which is how they get otherwise semi-rational adults to pay attention to them.

If Vick had done that, he would have been an instant hero. All of his cruelties to those poor dogs would have been thrown down the memory hole never to be seen in the MSM again. The next time you saw a newspaper story about this episode would be a small paragraph on page 28 of the classified section.

And, if his football career went down the tubes, I'm sure that Pope Al would appoint him as Archbishop of Georgia. After all, Al Gore made $100 million with his new church. An NFL quarterback's salary looks like chump-change next to that.

The Score

2007-08-26T19:37:00.000-07:00

Number of convictions related to the “most corrupt ever” Bush Administration: 1 (Scooter Libby).

Number of convictions related to “the most ethical administration ever” Clinton Administration: 47

And that number doesn't even begin to tell the tale. Here are some amazing and, apparently, memory-holed facts from that Progressive (i.e. Liberal) website:

- Number of congressional witnesses who have pleaded the Fifth Amendment, fled the country to avoid testifying, or (in the case of foreign witnesses) refused to be interviewed: 122
- According to the House Committee on Government Reform in September 2000, 79 House and Senate witnesses asserted the Fifth Amendment in the course of investigations into Gore's last fundraising campaign (odd, how Pope Al's record of scumbaggery has been completely forgotten - even by most Conservatives - The Exile).
- Total cost of the Starr investigation (3/00) $52 million
- Total cost of the Iran-Contra investigation: $48.5 million
(I seem to remember about a million Liberals complaining about the cost of the Starr investigations - even to this day. - The Exile)

That website (The Progressive Review) is an absolute goldmine of information about the Clinton scandals. It is really interesting because it was put together by a bunch of Left-wing Liberals. If that's any indication of how the Left really feels about the Clintons, Hillary is toast.

Here's a nice little list that they put together:

OTHER MATTERS INVESTIGATED BY SPECIAL PROSECUTORS AND CONGRESS, OR REPORTED IN THE MEDIA

Bank and mail fraud, violations of campaign finance laws, illegal foreign campaign funding, improper exports of sensitive technology, physical violence and threats of violence, solicitation of perjury, intimidation of witnesses, bribery of witnesses, attempted intimidation of prosecutors, perjury before congressional committees, lying in statements to federal investigators and regulatory officials, flight of witnesses, obstruction of justice, bribery of cabinet members, real estate fraud, tax fraud, drug trafficking, failure to investigate drug trafficking, bribery of state officials, use of state police for personal purposes, exchange of promotions or benefits for sexual favors, using state police to provide false court testimony, laundering of drug money through a state agency, false reports by medical examiners and others investigating suspicious deaths, the firing of the RTC and FBI director when these agencies were investigating Clinton and his associates, failure to conduct autopsies in suspicious deaths, providing jobs in return for silence by witnesses, drug abuse, improper acquisition and use of 900 FBI files, improper futures trading, murder, sexual abuse of employees, false testimony before a federal judge, shredding of documents, withholding and concealment of subpoenaed documents, fabricated charges against (and improper firing of) White House employees, inviting drug traffickers, foreign agents and participants in organized crime to the White House.

And, the next time they whine about Alberto Gonzales (or anyone else) not remembering something during an investigation, there's a really great list of Clinton and Co.'s sudden memory lapses there, too.

It just amazes (but doesn't surprise) me how those on the Left can so brazenly assert that the Bush administration is so corrupt, while completely ignoring the fact that the current front runner for their party's Presidential nomination was neck-deep in an administration that had a record that looked like something from a Mafia criminal indictment.

I've got some serious problems with the Bush administration, but corruption isn't one of them. The Left can howl at the moon all they want, but if you present the facts to them, this administration probably is the "most ethical" in a long time, if not ever. Ronald Reagan's administration had an even worse track-record than Bush does.

But none of that matters. It's propaganda. The Left knows that if they repeat it often enough, the fools who will follow them will believe it. It doesn't have to be true. It just has to fit their neuroses.

The Ultimate Racism of the Left

2007-08-26T18:22:00.000-07:00

For 150 years the Democrats did everything that they could to keep blacks in this country down. They were pro-slavery, pro-Jim Crow, pro-segregation…and then, suddenly, they turned on a dime and decided that blacks were “victims” that needed their help. And it was incredibly sudden as far as political trends go. Within about 5 years in the mid-sixties , the Left suddenly became the black man’s best friend and savior. Why?

In the 1960’s the Left decided that they could use the blacks in this country to help in their “revolution”. The way that they recruited blacks was to tell them that they were victims of racism and were being cheated by “whitey”.

Oddly, most of this planting of resentments actually came after the Civil Rights Act was passed. immediately after. Why, at the moment when the future of blacks in America looked so bright, would the Left discourage and alienate them? You see, the Left couldn’t risk giving the CRA time to work because it may actually pacify the blacks that they so desperately wanted as troops for the “revolution”. If the Left would have left blacks alone to become mainstream Americans, they would have lost millions of potential soldiers.

Does that sound cynical or, perhaps, conspiratorial? Perhaps. But consider the fact that radical Tom Hayden was calling the Black Panthers “America’s Vietcong”. Or that the Students for a Democratic Society called them the “vanguard of the revolution”. In other words, the blacks were going to be the ones in the streets being shot at when the “Revolution” finally started. The leaders of the Left, like the so-called “armchair generals” and “chickenhawks” whom they constantly mock, would manage the whole thing from a safe distance.

It’s also important to remember that the whole Leftist agenda was being stage-managed by the Soviet Union, where the treatment of blacks would make the so-called “repression” in America look like a day in Mr. Rogers’ neighborhood. The Soviet Union, in the form of their willing pawns who were the leaders of the Left and their uninformed, misfit followers, were willing to do anything to destroy America; and if that included using blacks as cannon-fodder, so much the better.

In they eyes of the Soviet/Leftist leaders, blacks were savage, uneducated and, most importantly, expendable. Any who survived the battles to bring about the “revolution” could be dealt with later. The Left has never had any use for blacks for anything other than political pawns.

It sounds almost silly talking about an armed revolution in America now, but forty years ago these people were dead serious. They glorified the slaughter that was the Russian Revolution which ushered in the Communists of the Soviet Union. They weren’t against the Vietnam war because so many people were being killed. They were against it because we were beating the Hell out of their Communist Comrades. Killing people wasn’t against their credo. 100 million dead victims of Communist regimes could tell you that…if they could still speak.

What most people don’t realize – and it’s not surprising when you consider that it’s never mentioned by the MSM – is that the Black Panthers, Rosa Parks, even Martin Luther King Jr. were all advocates of Communism. The Left conned them into believing that, under their glorious Socialist Utopia, all people would be equal.

They just forgot to mention that some people would be more equal than others.

Let the Smearing Begin!

2007-08-22T16:40:00.000-07:00

The Demobratz have begun to frame their arguments in opposition to General Petraeus' upcoming report on the progress of "the surge" in Iraq:

Senator Harry Reid (D - Panderland) commented on General Petraeus' upcoming presentation to the Senate today, saying, "While I support the troops, General Petraeus is a baby-killing liar who is nothing more than a minor demon in the Satanic Bush regime. I hope that we can have a civil conversation in the interest of civility and bipartisanship."

Later in the day, Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi weighed in on the upcoming briefing by the General:

"David Petraeus is a man and, as such, can't be trusted to speak the truth about his vicious, illegal warmongering on behalf of the Nazis in the Bush Administration.

Granted, I'm more of a man than any of the "men" in my party. Come to think of it, so is our current frontrunner in the Presidential campaign. But you can trust what we say because we have different genitalia than the General does."

Hillary Clinton also gave her take on the situation, saying:

"I've always said that we can, and should, do whatever it takes to win in Iraq. I've never doubted for a moment that the Iraq war was a good thing. And I was the first to vote for the surge. There are records of that vote, although my incompetent staff seems to have misplaced them at the moment.

Umm...has anyone seen Bill? Goddamn him! Somebody check the coat closet!"

In a stump speech in New Hampshire John Edwards was quoted as saying:

"Do I look alright? How's my hair?"

Barack Obama had this to say about the present situation in Iraq:

"We should invade Britain, show them pictures of our nuclear bombs, promise that we'll never use them on anyone and then sit down with Bin Laden and Zawahiri and tell them that we're sorry for whatever it is that we did to piss them off.

If that doesn't work, I'll have my beautiful wife, Michelle, give them a verbal lashing."

We attempted to contact Al Gore for a comment, but an aide said that he was taking confession from carbon-sinners at that time and couldn't be interrupted.

Dennis Kucinich was overheard during an appearance at a Star Trek convention saying, "Gandalf? When might I return to the Shire?"

The Demobratz are ready. I don't think that the format has been finalized yet, but I pray to God that the Bush administration has the intelligence to insist that Petraeus' testimony is televised. Nothing could be better than watching the man answer these grandstanding fools who will be questioning him.

Let's Help Mexico

2007-08-22T10:06:00.000-07:00

It looks like Hurricane Dean is going to cause a lot of devastation in Mexico. Much of the infrastructure and housing in the country could be badly damaged. They're going to need a lot of help to rebuild.

Coincidentally, I know where they can get 12 million Mexicans who will work cheap.

Fun WIth Dick and Patsy

2007-08-21T18:18:00.000-07:00

So Patsy Schroeder is crowing about the supposed fact that Liberals read more than Conservatives.

Well, Patsy, pamphlets at abortion clinics and protest signs don't count as books.

I'm not sure that I'd believe any poll put out by the Associated (Liberal) Press, but I think that there's a more fundamental flaw: Liberals have an overwhelming need to feel superior to everyone else. And Liberals lie constantly about everything. Put those two together, and how honest do you think they're going to be when speaking to a pollster?

"It's pretty hard to write a book saying, 'No new taxes, no new taxes, no new taxes' on every page."

No, that would be an easy book to write. To give Liberal writers their due, it is difficult to write a book that says "Conservatives are Nazis" in new and creative ways. Especially when its been said a million times already by a thousand other Liberal authors.

That quote also shows that Patsy hasn't actually read any Conservative books. She's no different than the people who declare Rush Limbaugh evil and "hate-filled"... but have never actually listened to his show. Like all liberals, she just believes what she's told (or has read...hmmm). The Conservative books that I've read focus on taxes for maybe 10% of their content. Most of the books are more focused on how the Left is doing everything in their power to destroy America with their push for Socialism.

OK, I admit that this is an ad hominem attack, but Patsy Schroeder is the girl who cried when she had to drop out of the Presidential race. And the reason that she had to drop out is because she is about as sharp as a marble. I don't know what she's been reading, but it hasn't increased her intelligence by any notable amount.

"Who are ya gonna believe...me or your lyin' eyes?" The Liberals that I know are certainly not big readers. They definitely don't read any more than Conservatives that I know. Quite a bit less, if anything. Personally, I have four different books going at the moment. That may be unusual, but I don't know one Conservative who doesn't have a book or two going at any given time.

And, unlike Patsy Schroeder, I actually listen to people on the other side. I regularly tune in to Air Unamerican radio. Some people think that it's masochistic of me to do so, but I've always found mental disorders fascinating - and it's like a mental institution broadcast to the world on that channel.

Most of the Liberals who call in to the Air Unamerican shows give the impression that they have to move their lips and follow along with their finger when they're reading Curious George. That is, if they're not too stoned to remember where they put the book. These are the people who think that Cindy Sheehan is, like, totally brilliant, you know?

A large part of the mental disorder of Liberalism is their obsessive need to feel more intelligent than other people. It's because somewhere deep inside they suspect that they're really not as smart as their counterparts on the Right. It's the insecurity that you can see in any child and, as we all know, Liberals from Marx to Clinton are nothing more than emotionally stunted children in adult bodies.

And so, a biased poll comes out, Patsy Schroeder reads what she wants to into it, and waves it about like a bloody flag because, in her eyes and the eyes of her political/mental equals, it "proves" that they're smarter than their hated adversaries.

Pathetic.

She's Like, You Know, Smart!

2007-08-19T15:40:00.000-07:00

For almost ten years now, the Left has delighted in disparaging George Bush for his inarticulateness. But what about Hillary?

Granted, she may be marginally more articulate than Cindy Sheehan but they both sound like old Valley Girls.

A couple of weeks back, Amanda Carpenter had a column over at Townhall.com that transcribed the speech that Hillary gave to one of the "breakout sessions" at YearlyKos. By my count, she used the phrase, "you know" 43 times in what may have been a half-hour speech.

Here's a sampling:

So, therefore, you know, having people who share our overall goals even if we disagree on tactics or strategy, but understanding where we are trying to take our country is really helpful because then it’s not just one voice or a couple of voices, it’s millions of voices -- and you know I doubt you know that we can’t go back and rewrite history certainly, you know (ouch! -ed.), -- but I think about what if we had the blogosphere in ‘93, ‘94 when I was working on healthcare and you know being hammered and they were raising $300 million dollars and distorting everything we were trying to do and we made our own mistakes but a lot of it was you know, trying to do something that was worth doing which we will get done when I am President finally.

Did I mention the flawless grammar?

Yeah. She's, like, totally brilliant. And so, you know, well-spoken.

No Wonder They're Confused

2007-08-15T16:26:00.000-07:00

A 1990 survey* by the Southern Christian Leadership Conference found that one-third of black American churchgoers believed that AIDS was a form of genocide. One-third also believed that HIV was produced in a germ-warfare lab, and 40 percent of black college students in Washington, D.C., agreed.

Bush details increased AID package for Africa.

Apparently, after 40 years of listening to Democrats tell them how "victimized" they are, the blacks in this country have gotten a bit confused. Could it be that they believe that Bush is detailing his genocidal plans for Africa in major policy speeches?

Yes, it's just a joke. But if they believe some of the things that are detailed in that article, it wouldn't surprise me much if they did believe that (I particularly like the part about how the first President of the United States was a black man).

You really need to read that article. The people who wrote it, who are black, were actually fired from their talk-radio jobs for pointing out the fact that those conspiracy-theories were ridiculous. The black "community" is even more screwed up than is apparent from the MSM's softball treatment of the subject.

"Sicko" Banned in Cuba

2007-08-12T17:50:00.000-07:00

I guess that this is the thanks you get for kissing Castro's posterior:

Havana, August 6, 2007 -- There is no doubt that the Cuban authorities will not allow the Cuban people the possibility of watching this documentary by Michael Moore, a leading movie producer and ideological ally of the Cuban regime.

Although it might look contradictory, the propaganda used in the film to discredit the USA health system while trying to highlight the excellence of the Cuban health system, turned out to be considered “subversive” by the Cuban regime. It so happens that he based his arguments on gross lies that do not represent at all the Cuban health drama.

(Tip o' the hat to Josue's Townhall Blog)

Checkin' It Out

2007-08-12T11:26:00.000-07:00

Changed a few things...just checking.

Campaign Reform

2007-08-09T15:30:00.000-07:00

If there's anything about current campaigns that needs reforming, it's this ridiculous schedule that we've begun since the last election. If we keep it up at this rate, the election is going to be held before the primaries.

What I want to know is, who thought that this was a good idea...and why?

The current Presidential campaign started, literally, the day after the last election in November '06. Why?

The campaigns used to start about 18 months before the election, giving us 6 months to nominate a candidate in the primaries and a full year for them to get their message out to the "undecided" voter...who didn't pay attention to the campaign until about the last month of the campaign anyway!

Is this really necessary? In today's political climate especially, most people know who they're going to end up voting for. If the rest of them need 2 years to decide whether they're for or against higher taxes, abortion, gay marriage or any of the other issues that separate the parties, maybe they shouldn't be voting. If they're that completely ignorant of the issues, do we really want them to be deciding who's running this country?

There was a minor brouhaha last week because somebody suggested that we have a very basic test regarding the issues before letting somebody vote. Many people were horrified at the thought. I, for one, would be all for it. Especially when you consider the Demobratz' tactics of scaring people into voting for them.

Demobratz never have any ideas...they don't need to have any. They just tell the "undecided voters" that Republicans want to take everything away from them and kill them and their families. And the genius in the "undecided voter" category, who pays absolutely no attention to what's going on in this country other than the "American Idol" standings, and who pays no attention to politics until the last month of the campaign, when Demobratz turn into Conservatives, believe every word of what they hear in the MSM and vote Democrat.

I've never seen a poll on the subject, but I'd bet that the vast majority of "Independent" voters vote for Demobratz. You have one part of that category who are too embarrassed to associate themselves with the "liberal" label of the Democrat Party, and the rest are people whose TV's don't often stray from the broadcast TV (i.e. MSM) channels and who believe what they read in the newspapers.

The only thing that a two-year campaign does is to give the Demobratz more time to spin their lies into something that your typical uninformed "Independent" voter will find palatable. It just gives them more time to find a way to demonize the Conservative message (such as it is) being put out by the Republican Party.

The first rule of propaganda is that endless repetition will make your point into the truth in the eyes of those who don't know what's really going on. This endless campaign works right into the hands of the spin-monsters of the Left who need to convince those who don't know better into believing that Socialism will solve all of their problems.

We need to reform the campaign process. I have no hope of eliminating the uninformed from the process. That would just be too easy for the Demobratz to get those very same uninformed voters up-in-arms. "You have a right to be ignorant and vote for us! In fact, we count on it!" If we were to eliminate the uninformed voter, the Demobratz could never win again, and they know it.

However, we need to convince some courageous person in Congress to bring a bill that will limit campaigning to a 1-year period. That would give the candidates a few months to get their message out to the primary voters, and 9 months for them to state their positions to the general public.

If the candidates can't get their message out in that time, perhaps they shouldn't be running.

And, if the "undecideds" can't figure out what they stand for in that time, perhaps they shouldn't be voting.

Demobratz

2007-08-05T19:58:00.000-07:00

A bunch of childish, plastic dolls who dress themselves up and act like prostitutes.

Into the Unknown

2007-08-03T20:26:00.000-07:00

I'm planning on updating my Blogger template sometime this weekend. Just a heads-up in case something odd happens. I don't want anyone to start a pogrom against Leftists because they believe that the desecration of this blog was a conspiracy to destroy me. Millions could die and I don't want to be responsible for that.

Let's hope that this doesn't make me regret coming back to Blogger.

Hillary's Presidency

2007-08-03T20:19:00.000-07:00

I don't have a crystal ball, but my gut-feeling is that, come January 2009, we will be calling Hillary Clinton "Madame President" (although, given her sensibilities, she may insist on Ms. President).

Will that be a disaster for this country? Most assuredly. But think about what will happen when this woman, who once assured us that her husband's administration would be the "most ethical administration in history" obtains the ultimate power.

Bill Clinton wanted power for power's sake. Once he got it, he really didn't care to do much with it. He just wanted the jet-setting lifestyle, the hobnobbing with rich, important people, the money and, of course, to get laid. I always got the sense that Hillary was more angry at him for not instituting a bloodless, Leftist "revolution" than she was about him screwing every woman who got within groping distance.

Bill Clinton was a slacker party-boy. Hillary is a true believer in the Socialist dream.

Hillary has all of the marks of your Leftist dictator: the unquenchable thirst for more and more power, the paranoia, the greed, the narcissism, the naked hatred of her opponents, the unflinching willingness to go to any length to destroy people who stand in her way, the arrogance to believe that her way is the only way and that she can completely change 40,000 years of human nature in a few, short years.

If you look at the years of Bill Clinton's Presidency, other than the sexual escapades, you can see Hillary's fingerprints on all of the scandals. From the Rose Law Firm billing records, to the gathering of FBI files relating to their opponents, to the firing of the White House travel office staff, to Whitewater, to the illegal fundraising, to the last-minute pardons, to the theft of White House belongings...she seems to be the one who was pushing all of this stuff while Bill seemed to be pliant and willing to just go along with it as long as nobody interfered with his fun. In fact, I've often wondered whether that was one of the things that Hillary liked about Bill: his willingness to let her play politics while he just played.

Yes, Hillary caught a lot of flack for all of the above, and more. But it was all filtered through Bill because he was the one who had been elected. She could have been indicted in a criminal court for a lot of that stuff, but going after the First Lady of the United States would have been political suicide for the Republican Party.

Now flash forward to 2009. Hillary is now the elected President of the United States. The Republicans...no...the "Vast Right-Wing Conspiracy" is now doing all that they can to stop her from implementing her Socialist dream on this country. They are criticizing her relentlessly. They are questioning her motives and catching her in her lies. They are threatening to take away her power base. What does she do?

She does what she's always done.

She first tries to destroy her enemies. And, as we've seen before, there's a very good chance that not all of her methods will be legal.

She will be desperate to get her policies pushed through. Even more than Bill, I think, she is the one obsessed with the Clinton legacy. In addition, she actually believes that her policies are what's best for the future of the Democrat Party...err... America. And she has already shown that she's willing to use unethical and/or "extra-legal" means to do that.

While she'll tell herself that she's doing it for the good of her party...nay, the good of the country, she will be in a never-ending fundraising mode just as she was in the 1990's. It will be nothing more than greed and lust for power, but she will justify it to herself. And, again, we've seen what lengths she and her cronies are willing to go to for a few dollars more.

To make a long story short, if she is elected President, the first Clinton Presidency is probably going to look tame compared to hers. Hillary's arrogance, paranoia, greed and hatred will drive her to do things that will result in an unending series of scandals that the Right will be only too happy to go after her for.

As opposed to the Left's caterwauling about President Bush's supposed "illegal" activities, Hillary Clinton's activities truly will be illegal. You can bet on it. It's who she is. To her and her Communist cronies, "the end justifies the means", which is nothing more than a different way of saying that "we are above the law".

Liberal Templates

2007-08-02T15:22:00.000-07:00

I've heard Scott Thomas Beauchamp compared to John Kerry for being a veteran who attacked his fellow soldiers and accused them of war atrocities.

What I haven't heard is the comparison between the two for joining the military for nothing more than their own self-aggrandizement.

Beauchamp joined the military so that he could "write a book".

Kerry joined the military to polish his credentials for his planned run for political office.

It's obvious that they were both your typical military-hating Leftists. There is no reason that either of them would have joined the military other than to gain credibility and stave off any criticism in their planned careers. And a huge part of that plan included sucking up to the Left by attacking their former brethren in the armed forces. They both knew that the Liberals were (and are today) desperately in need of military figures who would criticize the current war. And they both knew that the Liberals would ignore their obvious lies (Christmas in Cambodia, anyone?) and embrace them if they did that.

We know all about John Kerry and his lies. He has been completely discredited in everyone's mind except the Kool-aid drinkers, which includes a majority of Massachusetts voters.

But Mr. Beauchamp is another story. And that story is already being swept under the rug by the MSM.

Read this guy's Blogger blog, and you'll see that this guy had absolutely no reason to join the military. None. He's your typical, arrogant faux-intellectual Liberal who seems to like culture for no other reason than to say, "Look how cultured I am!".

In fact, if I didn't know that he married a gal from The New Republic (the very magazine in which his bogus "reports" from Iraq were published), I'd say that he was a beneficiary of Bill Clinton's "don't-ask-don't-tell" policy.

Here's a sample of his writing:

Sliced writsts recovering from barbwire night mission in a furnished 1600's bedroom window open to the stars strained notes The Magic Flute from further down the hall when I'm off work early she brings me coffee and a fresh stack of freshly pressed laundry while struggling through The World According to Garp auf Deutsch...warum?...now you are a citizen of the world, son, so she rents a car to take me to Bamberg this weekend and maybe plane tickets to London the next because through a month of silence and guilt and regret, reciting the Zarathustra quote over and over in your head, "I've always carried a disdain for creatures who considered themselves kind merely because they were clawless"..and you "get it" and you "understand" and you see yourself maybe not for the first time and finally a perfect rearrival of yourself, doch, ja, meine mereshweinkin ist sehr schon...die Welt ist deins...do you come to terms with the past or accept it or apologize and bow or cut free and run...

Yeah. There's a guy who was just aching to join the military and kick some Al Qaeda ass.

And, speaking of his wife, I wonder how she feels now that she's found out that this lying fool claimed that Conservative German blogger Claudia Heym was his girlfriend. Note that the pictures on both blogs are the same ones. This guy copied and pasted himself a beautiful German girlfriend!

Like the Liberal child that he is, even though he planned to be rich and famous, he thought that nobody would dig his lies up. Just like the Liberal child John Kerry thought that nobody would dig his lies up.

They're liars, they're fools and, despite their pretensions of intellectualism, they are stupid. They are no different than the vast, vast majority of Liberals.

Girly-girls Talk War

2007-08-02T12:05:00.000-07:00

It’s so cute when the girls in the Democrat Party try to act tough. It's like watching four-year-olds make pancakes: they always make a mess and screw it up, but it's funny to watch.

It's odd, but I have yet to hear a single Liberal call Obama a “warmonger”, a “chickenhawk” or even an “imperialist”.

I guess declaring war on our allies is OK…if you’re a Democrat; but declaring war on our enemies is not OK if you’re a Republican.

But they don’t have double standards. Nor are they hypocrites. If you doubt it, just accuse them of being hypocrites and watch how (hysterically) indignant they get.

How Long Will It Be...

2007-08-01T20:06:00.001-07:00

until the conspiracies and political finger-pointing begin?

Governor Pawlenty vetoed a transportation funding bill from the Democrat-controlled legislature that was ridiculously expensive and wasteful. He'll be blamed.

There were (until this afternoon) ongoing discussions about expanding our useless light-rail system across this bridge. Minnesota Republicans have been fighting the light-rail system for 40 years. It doesn't make sense in this city where everybody drives everywhere. It'll turn into a mini-version of the 9/11 conspiracy theories: somebody brought the bridge down to discredit and show the folly of the light-rail proposals.

Terrorists blew the bridge up but the Bush administration is covering it up.

Bush is letting our infrastructure crumble so that he can pay for his illegal war in Iraq.

If we had more light-rail in this city, all of those cars wouldn't have been on the bridge

All of this and more is what we can expect from the loony-Left. It's coming. They can't help themselves anymore. Coming up with "unique" conspiracy theories is a badge of honor for these people now. It's what passes for deep thinking on the Left. It doesn't have to be fact-based, it just has to be complicated enough to make them actually use a tiny bit of what passes for logic amongst the Lefties. Remember: these are the people who can't grasp the concept of paying people not to work and then wondering why we have poor people who don't want to work.

When I was a younger man, we used to have parties on the riverbank under this bridge. It's a big bridge. Here are a few pertinent facts.

The news reports are saying that it handles 140,000 vehicles a day. I believe it.

The news reports say that it was only 60 feet high. I don't believe that. In the middle of the river it had to be over 100 feet high.

This bridge is (was) a few blocks from the Hubert H. Humphrey Metrodome where the Vikings and the Twins play ball.

This bridge is (was) the main North/South highway through Minneapolis. It's gone. There is no longer any easy way through the city. This is going to screw up traffic in this city for years.

It would be nice if the Left in this state didn't try to use this disaster to their political advantage. But they will. It's who they are and what they do. They are power-hungry little Socialist toadies for whom the end justifies the means. And, if using tragedy to advance their political agenda is what it takes, they'll have no qualms about that.

You can watch for the finger-pointing in the most Socialist newspaper in the country, bar none (including the New York Times): The Minneapolis Star-Tribune.

Aha!

2007-07-30T12:11:00.000-07:00

I've figured out why the Libs are so sympathetic towards the Muslim nutpacks:

If they drag us back to the 7th century, there will be nothing to cause global warming.

You've (Finally) Got a Friend

2007-07-29T13:33:00.000-07:00

Thank God that somebody invented the word "buffoon", or we'd have to figure out a way to describe Michael Moore.

Watch a video of one of this fool's speeches sometimes if you have only seen clips and interviews on TV or snippets of his movies.

The impression that I always get is that he's not terribly bright, but he's at least marginally more intelligent than the vast majority of his audience. And those who do out-watt him in the intelligence department want to believe everything that he says anyway.

I've heard him described as "brilliant" many, many times. His supposed brilliance, like the vast majority of those on the Left, really has nothing to do with intelligence. It is more of a low, cunning, animal cleverness that is reminiscent of the brutes who used to run the Soviet Union (and apparently are, once again).

It's not intelligence in the 'thinking' sense. It's a completely calculated position taken by Leftists for no other reason than getting people to pay attention to them. Moore, like all of the misfits on the Left, figured out early in life how to get people to pay attention to him, if not actually like him.

After all, in their self-hating minds, nobody was ever going to like them, so just getting somebody to acknowledge their existence was the best that they could hope for.

It's so easy to see what drives these people: just think about the half-dozen or so kids in your school who seemed to do everything that they could to piss off the "normal" kids in school. They were usually sullen, depressed slobs who had absolutely no social skills whatsoever. They were sneering, arrogant, nasty little creatures who hated everyone and everything associated with "normal" kids.

Because of their personalities, they had no friends...and couldn't figure out why. They just resented everyone for not accepting them as they were. It never occurred to them to ask why anyone would ever want to hang around with somebody like themselves. It also never occurred to them to clean themselves up, try to be decent human-beings and be social. In their eyes, they were "the underdog", and everyone else was just stupid and didn't understand their brilliant, singular outlook on life. The rest of the kids were "sheep".

Fast-forward 10, 20...50 years, and you have Michael Moore, Rosie O'Donnel, Noam Chomsky and many thousands of lesser-known Leftists. They are nothing more than the traumatized, resentful children that they were back in school. They never grew up, and the vast majority of them never will.

The only difference is that, after they got out of high school, they found other misfits who were just as hate-filled and resentful as they were.

Throughout their childhoods, they told themselves that they really had no desire to belong to any "clique". They didn't need other people. They were the "lone-wolves". In other words, they lied to themselves (just as they're able to lie to themselves today).

But, once they found a bunch of people whose personalties exactly matched theirs, they discarded every little bit of that thinking and grabbed on to that group of fellow misfits with a death-grip.

"I HAVE FRIENDS!!!" Not knowing what true friendship (or the loyalty that it brings) really is, they figured that the people who had suffered through the same humiliations of life that they had were...friends. And, if not, at least they weren't alone any more.

And so, they were self-inducted into the philosophy that fit them so well: all-encompassing fairness, equality, lack of prejudice and oppression...all enforced with the power of the government.

And, in addition to that, bringing down the system of the "normal kids" (i.e. America) couldn't be more suited to their mindset. They would destroy the normal, age-old sense of community for no other reason than they, personally, couldn't figure out how to operate in that community.

It's been said that "Liberalism is a Mental Disorder" (I have the T-shirt), but it usually seems to be said in a half-joking way. I assure you that it's not a joke.

Liberalism/Progressivism/Leftism/Socialism/Communism...whatever the mainstream Democrats want to call themselves nowadays, they are nothing more than seriously disturbed children who have gained power in our system.

So Why Did He Do It?

2007-07-25T15:53:00.000-07:00

The lessons of history, confirmed by evidence immediately before me, show conclusively that continued dependence on relief induces a spiritual and moral disintegration fundamentally destructive to the national fiber. To dole out relief in this way is to administer a narcotic, a subtle destroyer of the human spirit. It is inimical to the dictates of sound policy. It is a violation of the traditions of America .

- President Franklin Roosevelt, 1935 State of the Union speech, predicting the future of his Socialist welfare programs.

We Care. No...Really!

2007-07-24T17:31:00.000-07:00

The Left wants to destroy the healthcare system in this country. As with all Leftist movements, they want everyone to be equally miserable…except for themselves, of course.

The Kool-aid mixers (as opposed to the Kool-aid drinkers) have to look around the world and see what government-run healthcare does to the system. They have to know that it dooms many, many people to long waits, thus prolonging the pain that they must endure. From waiting for hours to get treatment for a broken bone, to waiting month after painful month for more complex procedures such as heart surgery or joint replacement, the patient is forced, by the very people who claim to care about them, to suffer needlessly. And many of them suffer for all of those months only to die before they can get help.

And those on the Left, those who claim to be the “compassionate” among us, couldn’t care less about all of the pain that millions of people will needlessly endure, because socialized healthcare serves as a means to many of their ends.

First of all, it gives them what every Leftist/Democrat craves most: Power over vast numbers of other people. And this wouldn’t be just any power…this would be the power of life-and-death over 300 million people. No drug, no sexual experience, nothing could possibly ever equal the experience of wielding that kind of power if you’re a Lefty. If the pharmaceutical industry could synthesize that feeling into drug form, every Left-winger on this earth would be an instant addict.

But, of course, under the Socialist healthcare system that drug could never be made, because the pharmaceutical companies would have no incentive to invent it.

Personally, I think that the market for prescription drugs is grossly distorted due to the insurance companies’ willingness to pay whatever cost the drug makers demand and pass the cost (and then some) on to the employer/employee’s health plan, but that’s another discussion.

But if the Lefties have their way, they will strip all profit motive from the pharmaceutical companies, because they know that even their beloved Church of the Federal Government couldn’t afford to give away free drugs…even if those companies made only modest profits. Drugs, like healthcare itself, will have to be rationed.

And you can forget about any new drugs. How many helpful drugs did the Soviet Union or China come up with? Why would the drug companies bother pouring billions into developing new drugs if they’re not going to make any profit from it?

And so, the Left will force millions more to suffer and die because of lack of what are now common drugs and because few, if any, new drugs will be created.

But the Democrats, the Leftists, don’t care about anyone else’s pain and suffering. They just want to control. They want to “screw the corporations”. Only they should have that kind of power! Because, of course, only they know how to use that power. Hey, look at how well welfare, Social Security, Medicare, etc. have turned out!

One more way that a Communist medical system advances the agenda of the Left, who worship death in every form (abortion, euthanasia, etc.), is the fact that many more people would die early and/or unnecessarily.

To those on the Left, every death is to be celebrated (unless it’s Matthew Shepard or an AIDS “victim” or a murderer on death-row) because the world is overpopulated. Paul Ehrlich's The Population Bomb dressed up a Leftist fantasy as a prediction when he “predicted” that hundreds of millions would die because of overpopulation.

And it’s really no wonder why the Left wants so many people to die: If you can reduce the population by n%, that’s just that many fewer people that their Church of the Federal Government has to take care of. Of course, it never occurs to them that they’d have n% fewer people producing things for their economy. That would require one thing that the Children of the Left have always lacked: The ability to make logical conclusions.

The Left is obsessed with Government-ru(i)n(ed) healthcare. Anyone who thought that it had gone away with Hillary’s “humiliating” defeat in 1993 has forgotten one thing: to be humiliated, one has to have a sense of humility. And to have humility, you have to believe that there is a power greater than yourself.

We Don't Have to Do What We Promised

2007-07-24T09:47:00.000-07:00

The Democrats can’t afford to wait until September (you know, like they agreed to do) when Gen. Petraeus’ report on the Iraqi surge is due.

The full strength of the surge troops has only just arrived, and we are making amazing progress there.

If they wait until September, the good news (bad news, for them) will get out no matter how hard the MSM tries to suppress it. And, if that happens, the American people may actually get excited. There's nothing we like more than a good comeback when all looks hopeless.

They are in complete panic mode. Hence their “Pull-out-of-Iraq-Bill-of-the-Week” behavior. Their behavior is (surprise!) exactly childlike: “Well, when we agreed to wait until September we didn’t actually think that it was going to work!” I'm waiting for Harry the Re(i)d to say that he had his fingers crossed.

It’s no different than when the voters in my great state of Minnesota elected Jesse (The Mind is a Terrible Thing) Ventura as governor: Nice going, people. You just elected a (bunch of) 6-year-old(s).

Proud Daddy

2007-07-19T18:46:00.000-07:00

My daughter burned through the entire Harry Potter series in about a month. She's eight years old.

She asked if she could read "one of Daddy's books". She is, at this moment, laying in bed reading George Orwell's "Animal Farm".

We discussed the concepts of symbolism, Communism and Capitalism. All appropriate subjects for this book.

Assuming she doesn't become too rebellious in her teen years, she could become the Liberals' next worst nightmare.

Ann Coulter, unfortunately, can't live forever.

Shocking!

2007-07-19T16:56:00.000-07:00

An anonymous source, whom we'll call 'John Thomas', has informed me that there are some very disturbing practices being perpetuated at abortion clinics in this country:

While I was an intern at various abortion clinics I witnessed some things that can only be described as horrific.

At one particular clinic it was a common practice to drape the umbilical cords from aborted babies around one's neck and ask the interns, "How do you like my tie?" The laughter was always uproarious. One nurse even suggested that we put the video on YouTube.

At another clinic in the Midwest I witnessed doctors playing soccer with the corpses of recently aborted babies on the slick, tiled floor of the operating room. They had the tiny hands of the fetuses mounted on sticks on each side of the room and would keep score by raising a finger of one of the hands whenever one would score a goal.

The Left would, of course, scoff at that "anonymous", unsourced story. But somehow, ridiculous unsourced stories by anonymous "soldiers" from Iraq, seem perfectly plausible to them.

But they "support the troops"... don't they?

Poor Val

2007-07-19T16:35:00.000-07:00

The lawsuit brought by Valerie (Ask Me About My Covertness) Plame against the Bush administration has been dismissed. To Hell with the evidence...they're outraged (of course)!

"This case is not just about what top government officials did to Valerie and me." Wilson said in a statement. "We brought this suit because we strongly believe that politicizing intelligence ultimately serves only to undermine the security of our nation."

Translation: "This case is about getting us more publicity and more money. And if we can use the Clintonian tactic of destroying the people who showed us to be the liars that we are, so much the better!"

"But there can be no serious dispute that the act of rebutting public criticism, such as that levied by Mr. Wilson against the Bush administration's handling of prewar foreign intelligence, by speaking with members of the press is within the scope of defendants' duties as high-level Executive Branch officials," (Judge) Bates said.

Translation: "When all evidence points to the fact that Mr. & Mrs. Plame are nothing more than lying publicity hounds, their targets have the right to defend themselves."

Of course, they'll appeal the verdict. As is normal with anyone on the Left, especially those with Bush Derangement Syndrome, they are somehow able to believe their own lies.

That's NOT the Point!

2007-07-15T15:45:00.000-07:00

One thing that we Conservatives just cannot seem to stop doing is debating the Left on their talking points instead of the real reason behind their positions.

The Left lies. Constantly. Non-stop. Always. Its not even a matter of "if their lips are moving". If they're thinking...they're lying. Because they have repeated the Leftist talking points to themselves so often that they have forgotten (if they ever really knew) the real reason for their positions on everything.

Gun control: They argue this point in terms of accidental shootings and crime statistics and crazy, right-wingers who snap and kill their entire family (although they have yet to come up with an actual case of that ever happening).

And we, on the Right bring up our own statistics belying their statistics about accidental shootings, showing that crime actually goes down with an armed populace and asking them to show one single episode of a verified right-winger snapping and killing anyone with a gun.

Stop it!

You know what is really behind their hatred of you and me being able to lawfully posess firearms. If you have any political leanings at all, you know that their hatred of guns has nothing to do with crime, murder or any of their other objections to them. That would mean that they actually cared about something or someone other than their political goals.

They don't want you and me to have guns because as long as we citizens are armed, they have no chance of ever implementing their Socialist Utopia upon us. When there are a few-hundred-million guns in the hands of law-abiding citizens, they know that their precious, childish dreams of "revolution" will never happen.

We know that!!! So why do we keep arguing against their camouflage? Why? Knock it off!

The proper procedure for arguing against a Lefty when she starts crying alligator tears about people dying from handguns is to ridicule the fact that she might actually care about people dying. Remember: these are the same people who have killed 100 million (and still counting) people in the past century. They don't care about inner-city (Libspeak for blacks) kids killing each other. The ones who kill each other aren't likely voters, anyway.

No, what they care about is tens-of-millions of well-armed citizens who would crush them if they ever decided to try to really play "revolution".

And the same applies to every one of their positions.

Abortion: The Left's obsession with abortion has nothing to do with "a woman's right to choose" or "the health of the mother". It has everything to do with obstructing their march toward Communism. That's why NOW didn't even seem embarrassed at their hypocrisy over supporting serial-adulterer and probable-rapist Bill Clinton. For any Leftist organization, their stated objective has nothing to do with their real political goal.

Stop arguing with them about it. Call them out for being the liars that they are.

Homosexuality: Again, it's about nothing more than destroying the American family, which is what holds this country together, and destroying the norms that have made this country into the greatest nation ever.

Sure, you may love the person that you're having sex with. It's possible that you might even give your life for them. But it's much more likely that you're going to do those things for your children and the parent of your children.

Taxes: "We need to raise taxes so that we can take care of the less fortunate" is the usual Leftist spew. Again, these are the people who killed 100 million (and counting) people. Why does anyone really believe that they care about anything other than power?

If you have the money to take care of yourself, you don't need them.

We all know this. All of us. If you care enough to have a political blog, or to read a political blog, you know that this is true. From "animal-rights" to illegal aliens to global warming, we need to quit arguing about whether the science behind it is true...because we know that it isn't!

When they speak of "global warming", we need to point out that they couldn't care less about global warming. We need to emphatically state that their goal is nothing more than a clumsy power-grab.

Quit arguing the "facts" with these people because, not only are their "facts" wrong, but they don't even care that they're wrong.

As Marx said, they're just a means to an end.

I'm Thinking of a Number...

2007-07-13T12:16:00.000-07:00

The new Democrat talking point is that we need to "draw down" the number of troops in Iraq to just enough to "take care of our interests".

But they never give an actual number.

How do they know that the number isn't 160,000?

Cindy for President!

2007-07-11T20:25:00.000-07:00

To hell with Cindy Sheehan running for Nancy Pelosi's House seat...we need to get the Moonbats to scare the Democrat Party into putting her on the Presidential ticket!

The Democrats are so afraid of the Loons in their party that it could actually happen.

And once those Americans who pay just enough attention to the MSM to think that they know what's going on get a load of the real Cindy on the campaign trail, rats from a sinking ship wouldn't even begin to describe the flight from the Democrat Party.

Not only that, but just think about how entertaining it would be watching her make public speeches for the next year-and-a-half! The woman makes George Bush sound like Shakespeare. We could howl in laughter as we watched the Dems fall right off the Left side of the map.

Time to get on Kos, Moron.org, etc. and plant the...meme.

A Blind Spot in Their Mirror

2007-07-11T20:11:00.000-07:00

The Democrats in Congress are criticizing the Iraqi government for...get this...not getting anything done!

Oh Nancy? Oh, Harry? Could you please recount your list of accomplishments since you took over?

They know no hypocrisy because they are absolutely blind to their own shortcomings.

I Feel Your Pain

2007-07-10T20:24:00.000-07:00

Those on the Left are constantly trying to demonstrate their empathy for others for one simple reason: they don’t have any. They feel nothing for anyone…except themselves.

That may sound like nothing more than a statement designed to dehumanize an enemy, but it’s not. It’s a simple, demonstrable statement of fact.

They lack one of the basic elements of the human soul: the ability to care about others. Their self-centeredness is total. And somewhere, deep, down inside, they know that they’re not whole, which is why they strive so hard to show that they are. They don’t want others (or themselves) to think of them as freaks.

Perhaps that’s why Marxism flourished the way that it did. In theory, Marxism showed compassion for everyone by making all people equal and eliminating want and need in the world.

If you lack the inner ability to feel empathy for your fellow human beings, what better way to try to fill the void than to join a political movement that will fill it for you?

The problem is, lacking the ability to understand the basic human ability to feel for others also leaves a person unable to understand basic human nature.

And so, Marxism (aka Socialism, aka Progressivism, aka Leftism, aka Communism), while a wonderful theory, is doomed to failure every time that it’s tried. Unless the Left can find a few billion people in which nobody wants to have power over others, it can never work. Unless they can find all of those people, and none of them have any tendency to abuse that power, it will always fail.

Unfortunately those who are attracted to Leftism, the very people who want to run other people’s lives, who want power at any cost whatsoever, are also those who lack empathy for their fellow human beings.

They join the Leftist movement to make the world a Utopia, and that Utopia always ends up slaughtering millions of people. Always. Over 100 million people in the last century…and still counting in this century. Because they really have no concept of the actual, very real suffering of other people. To the self-centered Left, other people are mere objects. Pictures, words on a piece of paper, newspaper stories, TV shows, movies, videos.

They are so obsessed with their own self-hatred and suffering in this world that they cannot feel for anyone else.

And so you have the cold-blooded slaughters that have taken place during every Leftist “revolution” (aka political coup). Every one. There has never been a Leftist revolution in which many, many people have been tortured and murdered.

You have “Uncle Joe” Stalin starving millions of Ukrainians to death, murdering and torturing millions of his own citizens and then quipping “The death of one person is a tragedy. The death of millions is a statistic”. There’s some empathy for you.

Most of the Left today “acknowledges” that Stalin was a blood-thirsty murderer, but only because to do otherwise would make put them in the same monstrous category as him. They supported him throughout his entire reign of terror and for long afterward; until it became politically unviable to do so.

It may have been looked on as an aberration born of ignorance, but the same thing happened with Mao Tse Tsung in China. Also with Castro and Che in Cuba. And Ho Chi Min in Vietnam. Let’s not forget Pol Pot in Cambodia, either.

The Left didn’t want us to fight Hitler until he turned against the Soviet Union.

The Left forced us out of Vietnam because of politics. Millions died.

The Left talks endlessly at the United Nations about what to do in Sudan. The death-toll is well on the way to a million and there’s no indication that anything will be done soon.

The Left passed resolution after resolution in the U.N. telling Sadaam Hussein to stop slaughtering people. Nothing was actually done. Hussein continued to torture and kill hundreds-of-thousands of people for 12 more years.

Now the Left wants us to abandon Iraq, once again for nothing more than political advantage, knowing full well that it will result in an absolute slaughterhouse.

The Left has condemned millions of minorities in this country to lives of dependence, misery and premature death through their social policies, and they refuse to admit their failure for the simple fact that it would hurt their egos and they would have to admit that they did it for no other reason than to try to make themselves believe that they really do care about other people.

And yet, these people who supported the murder of over one-hundred-million people, and who are well on the way to letting millions more die, these people who have consigned probably a billion people to lives of misery and deprivation, want us to believe that they are the ones who “care” about people. That they are the ones who have empathy for their fellow man.

What’s truly frightening is that they actually believe it.

No wonder they hate Conservatives so much. If those on the Left can let hundreds-of-millions die, how much worse must their political enemies be?

And there you have their belief that Conservatives are actually out to destroy the entire world.

Shot Across the Bow

2007-07-09T07:02:00.000-07:00

We need to find a Republican Senator or Congressman to put forth a bill, call it the “Fairness in Television Act” or something equally silly, that calls for any TV news or entertainment shows that use the “public airwaves” to have “balance” if they proffer any type of political views.

Then watch the Democrat Party squirm.

It will be a pre-emptive strike. The Democrats would have to try to explain why this would be different than the “Fairness Doctrine” that they want to impose on talk-radio. Just the thought of losing their political megaphones of Hollywood and the MSM would cause them to drop the whole issue immediately and forever.

Because they know that without those two entities ramming their Leftist theology down America’s throat 24/7, their party could never survive.

I'm Back

2007-07-08T17:25:00.000-07:00

Having your own domain is great. The time that is needed to keep it up is not so great.

Therefore, after being away from Blogger for a year, I've decided to grace them with my presence once again. Blogger had its problems in the past, but the WYSIWYG interface definitely saves time. I also see that they've fixed one of my huge complaints that I had with an "autosave" feature. One of the main reasons that I bailed out of Blogger was the fact that I got sick of having my posts disappear into the ether before I posted them.

In the upcoming days I'm going to be trying to switch Haloscan and all of the other little add-ons over to this site. I'm also going to try to customize it a bit, but that will be an ongoing thing, I'm sure. Hopefully I'll be able to post some stuff, too.

For those of you who don't remember me, the best thing about blogging was the troll hunting. I used to get some trolls who made the Kids in the Kos look absolutely rational. Hopefully I can snare some more. It was incredibly entertaining.

I almost forgot how easy this was. It's good to be back.

A New Reason to Panic!

2007-07-08T17:22:00.000-07:00

What if the Global Warmingists have their way and they overdo it (as Leftists are known to do)? What if, through their hysteria and panic, their ideas for stopping global warming work too well? What if they send us back into another ice age?

And all of those hydrogen-powered cars that they're talking about? What comes out of the tailpipe? Water!!! If we have millions of these things driving around, won't all of that excess water raise sea-levels? Why, the next thing we know, Manhattan will be under water!!! And frozen!!!

Oh, sure, we can't be sure that it'll happen, but what if there's even a chance that it will? Aren't we obligated, for our children's and grandchildren's sake to do something about it before it becomes a reality?

What we need to do is to find a bunch of scientists whose own self-interests demand that they come to a "consensus". We need to declare the Global Cooling debate over, and stigmatize anyone who disagrees as Global Cooling deniers!!!

There is no time to waste. We need to grill more, fart more, not tune up our SUV's and lower the tire pressure so that they get worse mileage! We need to endlessly lobby the legislatures to enact anti-global-cooling laws. We need to quit recycling. We need to remove the air-scrubbing equipment from our coal plants and have them burn the most dirty coal that they can find!

If we don't act now, most of the world will be a skating rink in 50 years! The debate is over!!!

Do it for the children!

The Family's Going to the Dogs

2007-07-03T17:31:00.000-07:00

The newest member of our family, Sadie:

She's part Beagle, Part Basset Hound, and part Husky. The different-colored eyes come from her Husky parent. Must be an evolution thing to further the species...I guess. Maybe the walrus would hesitate for a second and think, "Wow, that dog that is coming to kill me has two different-colored eyes! Freaky!"

As much as I, as a Conservative, am supposed to desire the enslavement of my child, nothing has ever made me happier than telling Monkey-Girl that Sadie was hers.

I'm going to have to work on that cold-hearted thing before I get kicked out of the Right-wing cabal.

Making the Move

2006-07-24T16:14:00.000-07:00

Well, ladies and gentlemen, I am officially bailing out of Blogger.

As of today, I will no longer be posting here. My posts can now be found at the new Exile From Hillary's Village.

The site is far from finished, but it works well enough. I still have to set up my Trophy Room before I go hunting trolls again, among other things.

To those of you who link to me, I would greatly appreciate it if you would change the link to reflect the new address: http://www.village-exile.com.

Thanks all. See ya at the new spot!

TTLB: Rank of the Antichrist!

2006-07-19T19:51:00.000-07:00

Rank: # 6666
Exile from Hillary's Village
a Slithering Reptile

Let's Make a Deal

2006-07-17T16:17:00.000-07:00

Does somebody want to give me an example of negotiations ever stopping a war and averting more bloodshed?

I may not be a history major, but I know more than most. Let's take only the wars that America has been involved in for example.

The Revolution? Nope, had to defeat the British.

War of 1812? Nope, had to defeat the British. Again.

Civil War? Nope, had to defeat the Confederates.

Spanish-American war? Had to defeat them, too.

WW I? Defeated them.

WW II? Ditto.

Korea? Negotiated an armistice, but only because Korea and a billion Chinese were arrayed against us and we didn't commit completely. Technically, that war never ended and is still in cease-fire mode today. And how many have died in North Korea since then?

Vietnam? The firsy politically correct war. The only reason that we didn't crush the North Vietnamese (i.e. "defeated" them) was because our troops' hands were tied by the politicians. And 1 million dead Vietnamese, and the refugees created by rhe Communist takeover after we bailed out, will tell you that negotiating an end to the conflict certainly didn't avert more bloodshed.

Grenada? Not much of a war, but defeated them.

Gulf War? Stomped on them and defeated them.

Iraq war? Defeated the Iraqi army. In the process of defeating the leftovers and fanatics.

Does anyone see a trend here?

These wars were between secular governments, and they only negotiated after one side was defeated (there's that "D" word again!). What makes the Left think that there's the slightest chance that negotiations would work when dealing with absolute religious fanatics who haven't been defeated yet?

As usual, they haven't thought about it. It just sounds right, so it has to be right. Right?

Only if you're an emotional child with no ability to actually think.

Stop Being a Pain!

2006-07-17T15:23:00.000-07:00

What the hell is wrong with these damned Jews? Why won't they just go quietly and let themselves be exterminated? After all, they went quietly for Hitler! Why do they have to be so belligerent now?

Especially when you consider that the Muslims have left-wing minority/victim status. Oh, I know that there are 500 million Muslims against 6 million Jews in the Mideast, but it's just plain racism! They let themselves be killed by the millions when it was a white, European guy who was killing them, but when it's a "person of color" like the Muslims, they actually fight back!

Besides, as long as we on the Left believe in your cause, you can be a majority and still be a minority/victim group. Just ask the women in America.

That is truly what the Left believes should happen. Jaques Chirac, Vladimir Purin, the vast majority of the UN and all of the rest of the Left think that it's downright rude of the Jews to actually defend themselves! They're hurting the self-esteem of the Muslims, for Allah's sake!

After all, I'm sure that these peace-loving Muslims don't really mean it when they say that they want to "wipe the Jews off the face of the earth", or "annihilate The Zionists" It's just rhetoric!

(I actually heard not one, but two liberals say that on the radio after I wrote that! They don't believe anyone could possibly be that evil. Well, except for Conservatives.)

Not only do the Jews have tha audacity to be Jewish, but they blatantly live in a Democracy! And wherever there is a Democracy, there is that much less of a chance for their Communist Utopia. And if Israel kicks Hezbollah and Syria out of Lebanon. well, there's another Democracy!

Not to mention the one that's budding next door in Iraq! This Democracy thing is getting out of hand! It's no wonder the Left is in such a panic.

So what are the Israelis supposed to do? Why, sit down and negotiate, of course. Well, here's a sample of what the negotiations will be like:

Muqtar: "If you promise to cease all resistance and commit suicide, we will stop trying to kill you."

Moshe: "That is not acceptable."

Muqtar: "Death to the Jew!!! Death to the infidel!!! Death, death, death!!!"

What does Israel have to lose? Only their very existence.

A Little Help

2006-07-15T19:33:00.000-07:00

We need to give them whatever help is necessary to finally rid their country of Hezbollah and Syrian influence for good.

Trying to defuse the violence, which began when Hezbollah captured two Israeli soldiers and killed eight others in a cross-border raid, Lebanon's prime minister indicated he might send his army to take control of southern Lebanon from Hezbollah — a move that might risk civil war.

...

The Western-backed prime minister, criticizing both Israel and Hezbollah, also pledged to reassert government authority over all Lebanese territory, suggesting his government might deploy the Lebanese army in the south, which Hezbollah effectively controls.

Live From Beirut

2006-07-15T16:11:00.000-07:00

This is kind of fascinating. It's a blow-by-blow account of what's happening in Lebanon from a person in Beirut (who's not real happy about what Hizbollah is doing).

What strikes me are the repeated statements that people over there are celebrating and congratulating each other. They're getting the living Hell beaten out of them, with worse to come, and they're too stupid to realize what is coming their way.

Is it possible for such a large part of an entire culture to be stupid and suicidal?

Oh, wait. We have the Left, don't we?

(Tip o' the hat to The Great Pumpkin)

Thanks, Israel

2006-07-14T21:26:00.000-07:00

Israel could be doing our efforts in Iraq a huge favor.

If Syria's government is preoccupied with the little problem that they may be looking at their own demise, they may be less likely to help the ""Religion of Pieces" terrorists sneaking into Iraq across their border to fight us and the Iraqis.

And if the pig terrorists think that they may have a chance to kill Jews, which is even better than killing Americans in their eyes, they might just want to hang around Syria and wait for the attack instead of going to Iraq.

And if Syria is taken out completely as a base for terrorists, the load on us and the Iraqis is lessened even more, and permanently.

Not only has supporting Israel been the right thing to do all these years, but it may pay off rather nicely in this case.